TSTP Solution File: ROB016-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : ROB016-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:56:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
equal(negate(add(d,e)),negate(e)),
file('ROB016-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
positive_integer(k),
file('ROB016-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ positive_integer(u)
| ~ equal(negate(add(negate(v),negate(add(w,negate(v))))),w)
| equal(negate(add(v,multiply(u,add(w,negate(add(w,negate(v))))))),negate(v)) ),
file('ROB016-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
~ equal(negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e))))))),negate(e)),
file('ROB016-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
equal(negate(add(negate(add(u,v)),negate(add(u,negate(v))))),u),
file('ROB016-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(12,plain,
( ~ positive_integer(k)
| ~ equal(negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))),d) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,4]),
[iquote('0:Res:3.2,4.0')] ).
cnf(13,plain,
~ equal(negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))),d),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[12,2]),
[iquote('0:MRR:12.0,2.0')] ).
cnf(124,plain,
equal(negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e))))),d),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,7]),
[iquote('0:SpR:1.0,7.0')] ).
cnf(125,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[124,13]),
[iquote('0:MRR:124.0,13.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ROB016-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 14:58:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS derived 85 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 34 clauses.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS allocated 75756 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.07 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : condition k_positive lemma_3_6 prove_result robbins_axiom
% 0.19/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------