TSTP Solution File: ROB015-1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : ROB015-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:12:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 3.74s 3.96s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : ROB015-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 04:05:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 3.74/3.95 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 3.74/3.95 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 3.74/3.95 Wed Jul 27 04:05:23 2022
% 3.74/3.95 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 32510.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 3.74/3.95 set(auto).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(auto1).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(process_input).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 3.74/3.95 clear(print_given).
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 list(usable).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] A=A.
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] add(X,Y)=add(Y,X).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] add(add(X,Y),Z)=add(X,add(Y,Z)).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] negate(add(negate(add(X,Y)),negate(add(X,negate(Y)))))=X.
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] multiply(one,X)=X.
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] -positive_integer(X)|multiply(successor(V),X)=add(X,multiply(V,X)).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] positive_integer(one).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] -positive_integer(X)|positive_integer(successor(X)).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e)))))=d.
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] positive_integer(k).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))))!=negate(e).
% 3.74/3.95 0 [] negate(add(e,multiply(successor(k),add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))))!=negate(e).
% 3.74/3.95 end_of_list.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 3.74/3.95 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 3.74/3.95 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(para_from).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(para_into).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 3.74/3.95 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 ------------> process usable:
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 1 [] -positive_integer(A)|multiply(successor(B),A)=add(A,multiply(B,A)).
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 2 [] -positive_integer(A)|positive_integer(successor(A)).
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 3 [] negate(add(e,multiply(k,add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))))!=negate(e).
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 4 [] negate(add(e,multiply(successor(k),add(d,negate(add(d,negate(e)))))))!=negate(e).
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 ------------> process sos:
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] A=A.
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 6 [] add(A,B)=add(B,A).
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 7 [] add(add(A,B),C)=add(A,add(B,C)).
% 3.74/3.95 ---> New Demodulator: 8 [new_demod,7] add(add(A,B),C)=add(A,add(B,C)).
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 9 [] negate(add(negate(add(A,B)),negate(add(A,negate(B)))))=A.
% 3.74/3.95 ---> New Demodulator: 10 [new_demod,9] negate(add(negate(add(A,B)),negate(add(A,negate(B)))))=A.
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 11 [] multiply(one,A)=A.
% 3.74/3.95 ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] multiply(one,A)=A.
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 13 [] positive_integer(one).
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 14 [] negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e)))))=d.
% 3.74/3.95 ---> New Demodulator: 15 [new_demod,14] negate(add(negate(e),negate(add(d,negate(e)))))=d.
% 3.74/3.95 ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 16 [] positive_integer(k).
% 3.74/3.95 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,5,flip.1] A=A.
% 3.74/3.95 Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] add(A,B)=add(B,A).
% 3.74/3.95 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 8.
% 3.74/3.95 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 10.
% 3.74/3.95 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 3.74/3.95 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 15.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 sos_size=434
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 ============ end of search ============
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 -------------- statistics -------------
% 3.74/3.95 clauses given 507
% 3.74/3.95 clauses generated 284767
% 3.74/3.95 clauses kept 511
% 3.74/3.95 clauses forward subsumed 10337
% 3.74/3.95 clauses back subsumed 0
% 3.74/3.95 Kbytes malloced 6835
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 3.74/3.95 user CPU time 1.86 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 3.74/3.95 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 3.74/3.95 wall-clock time 4 (0 hr, 0 min, 4 sec)
% 3.74/3.95
% 3.74/3.95 Process 32510 finished Wed Jul 27 04:05:27 2022
% 3.74/3.95 Otter interrupted
% 3.74/3.95 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------