TSTP Solution File: ROB009-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ROB009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5wwyZLiGf7 true
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:09:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.67s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : ROB009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5wwyZLiGf7 true
% 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:50:23 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.27 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.08/0.27 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.28 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.08/0.28 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.08/0.28 % Running in FO mode
% 0.13/0.57 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.13/0.57 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.13/0.57 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.13/0.63 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.13/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.13/0.67 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.13/0.67 % BCE start: 5
% 0.13/0.67 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.13/0.67 % PE start: 5
% 0.13/0.67 logic: eq
% 0.13/0.67 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.13/0.67 % done 8 iterations in 0.019s
% 0.13/0.67 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.13/0.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.67 thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(condition, axiom,
% 0.13/0.67 (( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ ( add @ b @ c ) ) ) ) =
% 0.13/0.67 ( negate @ ( add @ b @ ( negate @ ( add @ a @ c ) ) ) ))).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (((negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ c))))
% 0.13/0.67 = (negate @ (add @ b @ (negate @ (add @ a @ c)))))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condition])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 0.13/0.67 (( negate @
% 0.13/0.67 ( add @
% 0.13/0.67 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @
% 0.13/0.67 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 0.13/0.67 ( X ))).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.13/0.67 ((negate @
% 0.13/0.67 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 0.13/0.67 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 0.13/0.67 = (X0))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (((negate @
% 0.13/0.67 (add @ (negate @ (add @ b @ (add @ a @ c))) @
% 0.13/0.67 (negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ (add @ b @ c))))))
% 0.13/0.67 = (b))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(associativity_of_add, axiom,
% 0.13/0.67 (( add @ ( add @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) = ( add @ X @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.13/0.67 ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(commutativity_of_add, axiom, (( add @ X @ Y ) = ( add @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.13/0.67 ((add @ X0 @ (add @ X2 @ X1)) = (add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.13/0.67 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.13/0.67 ((negate @
% 0.13/0.67 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 0.13/0.67 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 0.13/0.67 = (X0))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl64, plain, (((a) = (b))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.13/0.67 [zip_derived_cl50, zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0,
% 0.13/0.67 zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(prove_result, conjecture, (( a ) = ( b ))).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( a ) != ( b )),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_result])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (((a) != (b))),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.13/0.67 thf(zip_derived_cl65, plain, ($false),
% 0.13/0.67 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.13/0.67 [zip_derived_cl64, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.13/0.67
% 0.13/0.67 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.67
% 0.13/0.67
% 0.13/0.67 % Terminating...
% 0.13/0.70 % Runner terminated.
% 0.13/0.71 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------