TSTP Solution File: ROB009-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : ROB009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:16:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (  11 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hapTR3o9uE/E---3.1_9609.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(associativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hapTR3o9uE/E---3.1_9609.p',associativity_of_add) ).

cnf(robbins_axiom,axiom,
    negate(add(negate(add(X1,X2)),negate(add(X1,negate(X2))))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hapTR3o9uE/E---3.1_9609.p',robbins_axiom) ).

cnf(condition,hypothesis,
    negate(add(a,negate(add(b,c)))) = negate(add(b,negate(add(a,c)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hapTR3o9uE/E---3.1_9609.p',condition) ).

cnf(prove_result,negated_conjecture,
    a != b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hapTR3o9uE/E---3.1_9609.p',prove_result) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    add(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    negate(add(negate(add(X1,X2)),negate(add(X1,negate(X2))))) = X1,
    robbins_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    negate(add(a,negate(add(b,c)))) = negate(add(b,negate(add(a,c)))),
    condition ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(X3,add(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    a != b,
    prove_result ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_5]),c_0_7]),c_0_10]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem    : ROB009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 00:45:52 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hapTR3o9uE/E---3.1_9609.p
% 0.16/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 9686 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.44  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting U----_206d_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting U----_206d_02_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 9691 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.44  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.44  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.16/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.16/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.16/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 7
% 0.16/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6
% 0.16/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 39
% 0.16/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.16/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 39
% 0.16/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 26
% 0.16/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.16/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.16/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.16/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.16/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34
% 0.16/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 34
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.16/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.16/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 453
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.44  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1512 pages
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.44  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.16/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.16/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------