TSTP Solution File: ROB003-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ROB003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I3MouMTXKv true
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:09:42 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 18.81s 3.26s
% Output : Refutation 18.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : ROB003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I3MouMTXKv true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:40:59 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 18.81/3.26 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 18.81/3.26 % BCE start: 5
% 18.81/3.26 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 18.81/3.26 % PE start: 5
% 18.81/3.26 logic: eq
% 18.81/3.26 % PE eliminated: 0
% 18.81/3.26 % done 135 iterations in 2.526s
% 18.81/3.26 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 18.81/3.26 % SZS output start Refutation
% 18.81/3.26 thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(prove_huntingtons_axiom, conjecture,
% 18.81/3.26 (( add @
% 18.81/3.26 ( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) @
% 18.81/3.26 ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ a ) @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) ) =
% 18.81/3.26 ( b ))).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 18.81/3.26 (( add @
% 18.81/3.26 ( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) @
% 18.81/3.26 ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ a ) @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) ) !=
% 18.81/3.26 ( b )),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_huntingtons_axiom])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (((add @ (negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ b))) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ a) @ (negate @ b)))) != (b))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(commutativity_of_add, axiom, (( add @ X @ Y ) = ( add @ Y @ X ))).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 18.81/3.26 (( negate @
% 18.81/3.26 ( add @
% 18.81/3.26 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @
% 18.81/3.26 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 18.81/3.26 ( X ))).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @
% 18.81/3.26 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @
% 18.81/3.26 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ X1) @ X0))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(there_exists_a_constant, axiom, (( add @ X @ c ) = ( c ))).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((add @ X0 @ c) = (c))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [there_exists_a_constant])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @
% 18.81/3.26 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ c)))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl105, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ X0))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((add @ X0 @ c) = (c))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [there_exists_a_constant])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((c) = (add @ c @ X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @
% 18.81/3.26 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @ (add @ (negate @ (add @ c @ X0)) @ (negate @ c))) = (c))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((c) = (add @ c @ X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (((negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (negate @ c))) = (c))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @
% 18.81/3.26 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @
% 18.81/3.26 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl546, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @
% 18.81/3.26 (add @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (negate @ c)) @ X0)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ c))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl39, zip_derived_cl32])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(associativity_of_add, axiom,
% 18.81/3.26 (( add @ ( add @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) = ( add @ X @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) = (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_add])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((add @ X0 @ c) = (c))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [there_exists_a_constant])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl105, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ (negate @ (add @ (negate @ c) @ X0))))
% 18.81/3.26 = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl581, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]: ((add @ (negate @ c) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 18.81/3.26 [zip_derived_cl546, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl3,
% 18.81/3.26 zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl105])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl581, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]: ((add @ (negate @ c) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 18.81/3.26 [zip_derived_cl546, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl3,
% 18.81/3.26 zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl105])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl605, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]: ((negate @ (negate @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 18.81/3.26 [zip_derived_cl105, zip_derived_cl581, zip_derived_cl581])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl659, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @ X0)
% 18.81/3.26 = (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl605])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl768, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.81/3.26 ((negate @ X0)
% 18.81/3.26 = (add @ (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 18.81/3.26 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl659])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl605, plain,
% 18.81/3.26 (![X0 : $i]: ((negate @ (negate @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 18.81/3.26 [zip_derived_cl105, zip_derived_cl581, zip_derived_cl581])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl4412, plain, (((b) != (b))),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 18.81/3.26 [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl768, zip_derived_cl605])).
% 18.81/3.26 thf(zip_derived_cl4413, plain, ($false),
% 18.81/3.26 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4412])).
% 18.81/3.26
% 18.81/3.26 % SZS output end Refutation
% 18.81/3.26
% 18.81/3.26
% 18.81/3.26 % Terminating...
% 19.24/3.41 % Runner terminated.
% 19.24/3.42 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------