TSTP Solution File: ROB002-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ROB002-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Hj6CwXkLvB true
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:09:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 1.04s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ROB002-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Hj6CwXkLvB true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:53:54 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/1.04 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 0.57/1.04 % done 75 iterations in 0.261s
% 0.57/1.04 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/1.04 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/1.04 thf(negate_type, type, negate: $i > $i).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(prove_huntingtons_axiom, conjecture,
% 0.57/1.04 (( add @
% 0.57/1.04 ( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) @
% 0.57/1.04 ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ a ) @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) ) =
% 0.57/1.04 ( b ))).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/1.04 (( add @
% 0.57/1.04 ( negate @ ( add @ a @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) @
% 0.57/1.04 ( negate @ ( add @ ( negate @ a ) @ ( negate @ b ) ) ) ) !=
% 0.57/1.04 ( b )),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_huntingtons_axiom])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.57/1.04 (((add @ (negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ b))) @
% 0.57/1.04 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ a) @ (negate @ b)))) != (b))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(commutativity_of_add, axiom, (( add @ X @ Y ) = ( add @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/1.04 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.57/1.04 (((add @ (negate @ (add @ a @ (negate @ b))) @
% 0.57/1.04 (negate @ (add @ (negate @ b) @ (negate @ a)))) != (b))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/1.04 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((add @ X1 @ X0) = (add @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_add])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(robbins_axiom, axiom,
% 0.57/1.04 (( negate @
% 0.57/1.04 ( add @
% 0.57/1.04 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ Y ) ) @
% 0.57/1.04 ( negate @ ( add @ X @ ( negate @ Y ) ) ) ) ) =
% 0.57/1.04 ( X ))).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.57/1.04 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/1.04 ((negate @
% 0.57/1.04 (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 0.57/1.04 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))
% 0.57/1.04 = (X0))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [robbins_axiom])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(double_negation, axiom, (( negate @ ( negate @ X ) ) = ( X ))).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((negate @ (negate @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [double_negation])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 0.57/1.04 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/1.04 ((negate @ X0)
% 0.57/1.04 = (add @ (negate @ (add @ X0 @ X1)) @
% 0.57/1.04 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl285, plain,
% 0.57/1.04 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/1.04 ((negate @ X0)
% 0.57/1.04 = (add @ (negate @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 0.57/1.04 (negate @ (add @ X0 @ (negate @ X1)))))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((negate @ (negate @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [double_negation])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl643, plain, (((b) != (b))),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.57/1.04 [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl285, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.57/1.04 thf(zip_derived_cl644, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/1.04 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl643])).
% 0.57/1.04
% 0.57/1.04 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/1.04
% 0.57/1.04
% 0.57/1.04 % Terminating...
% 1.68/1.15 % Runner terminated.
% 1.68/1.16 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------