TSTP Solution File: RNG125+4 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : RNG125+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:14 EDT 2023
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 50 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 71 ( 32 ~; 20 |; 19 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn; 2 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__2383,hypothesis,
~ ( ( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xu,X1) = xa )
| doDivides0(xu,xa)
| aDivisorOf0(xu,xa) )
& ( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xu,X1) = xb )
| doDivides0(xu,xb)
| aDivisorOf0(xu,xb) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.p1lqp2104c/E---3.1_1329.p',m__2383) ).
fof(m__2479,hypothesis,
~ ~ ( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xu,X1) = xa )
& doDivides0(xu,xa) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.p1lqp2104c/E---3.1_1329.p',m__2479) ).
fof(m__2612,hypothesis,
~ ~ ( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xu,X1) = xb )
& doDivides0(xu,xb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.p1lqp2104c/E---3.1_1329.p',m__2612) ).
fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
! [X152,X153] :
( ( ~ aElement0(X153)
| sdtasdt0(xu,X153) != xb
| ~ aElement0(X152)
| sdtasdt0(xu,X152) != xa )
& ( ~ doDivides0(xu,xb)
| ~ aElement0(X152)
| sdtasdt0(xu,X152) != xa )
& ( ~ aDivisorOf0(xu,xb)
| ~ aElement0(X152)
| sdtasdt0(xu,X152) != xa )
& ( ~ aElement0(X153)
| sdtasdt0(xu,X153) != xb
| ~ doDivides0(xu,xa) )
& ( ~ doDivides0(xu,xb)
| ~ doDivides0(xu,xa) )
& ( ~ aDivisorOf0(xu,xb)
| ~ doDivides0(xu,xa) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X153)
| sdtasdt0(xu,X153) != xb
| ~ aDivisorOf0(xu,xa) )
& ( ~ doDivides0(xu,xb)
| ~ aDivisorOf0(xu,xa) )
& ( ~ aDivisorOf0(xu,xb)
| ~ aDivisorOf0(xu,xa) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__2383])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( aElement0(esk41_0)
& sdtasdt0(xu,esk41_0) = xa
& doDivides0(xu,xa) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__2479])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
( aElement0(esk42_0)
& sdtasdt0(xu,esk42_0) = xb
& doDivides0(xu,xb) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__2612])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
( ~ doDivides0(xu,xb)
| ~ doDivides0(xu,xa) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
doDivides0(xu,xa),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
doDivides0(xu,xb),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
~ doDivides0(xu,xb),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11 % Problem : RNG125+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.05/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:42:16 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.p1lqp2104c/E---3.1_1329.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # sh5l with pid 1411 completed with status 8
% 0.17/0.46 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1408 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1425 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 50
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 198
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 193
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 45
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 43
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 150
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 561
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9399
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2292 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.039 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.052 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------