TSTP Solution File: RNG116+4 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : RNG116+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:55:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.77s 1.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  17   ~;  10   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn;   4   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f47,axiom,
    ( xu = sdtpldt0(xk,xl)
    & aElementOf0(xl,slsdtgt0(xb))
    & ? [X0] :
        ( sdtasdt0(xb,X0) = xl
        & aElement0(X0) )
    & aElementOf0(xk,slsdtgt0(xa))
    & ? [X0] :
        ( sdtasdt0(xa,X0) = xk
        & aElement0(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2456) ).

fof(f48,conjecture,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( xu = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X0),sdtasdt0(xb,X1))
      & aElement0(X1)
      & aElement0(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(f49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0,X1] :
        ( xu = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X0),sdtasdt0(xb,X1))
        & aElement0(X1)
        & aElement0(X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( xu = sdtpldt0(xk,xl)
    & aElementOf0(xl,slsdtgt0(xb))
    & ? [X0] :
        ( sdtasdt0(xb,X0) = xl
        & aElement0(X0) )
    & aElementOf0(xk,slsdtgt0(xa))
    & ? [X1] :
        ( sdtasdt0(xa,X1) = xk
        & aElement0(X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( xu != sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X0),sdtasdt0(xb,X1))
      | ~ aElement0(X1)
      | ~ aElement0(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f208,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( sdtasdt0(xb,X0) = xl
        & aElement0(X0) )
   => ( xl = sdtasdt0(xb,sK43)
      & aElement0(sK43) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f209,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( sdtasdt0(xa,X1) = xk
        & aElement0(X1) )
   => ( xk = sdtasdt0(xa,sK44)
      & aElement0(sK44) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f210,plain,
    ( xu = sdtpldt0(xk,xl)
    & aElementOf0(xl,slsdtgt0(xb))
    & xl = sdtasdt0(xb,sK43)
    & aElement0(sK43)
    & aElementOf0(xk,slsdtgt0(xa))
    & xk = sdtasdt0(xa,sK44)
    & aElement0(sK44) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK43,sK44])],[f63,f209,f208]) ).

fof(f376,plain,
    aElement0(sK44),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f210]) ).

fof(f377,plain,
    xk = sdtasdt0(xa,sK44),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f210]) ).

fof(f379,plain,
    aElement0(sK43),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f210]) ).

fof(f380,plain,
    xl = sdtasdt0(xb,sK43),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f210]) ).

fof(f382,plain,
    xu = sdtpldt0(xk,xl),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f210]) ).

fof(f383,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( xu != sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X0),sdtasdt0(xb,X1))
      | ~ aElement0(X1)
      | ~ aElement0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

cnf(c_214,plain,
    sdtpldt0(xk,xl) = xu,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f382]) ).

cnf(c_216,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xb,sK43) = xl,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f380]) ).

cnf(c_217,plain,
    aElement0(sK43),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f379]) ).

cnf(c_219,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xa,sK44) = xk,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f377]) ).

cnf(c_220,plain,
    aElement0(sK44),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f376]) ).

cnf(c_221,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X0),sdtasdt0(xb,X1)) != xu
    | ~ aElement0(X0)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f383]) ).

cnf(c_10111,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X0),xl) != xu
    | ~ aElement0(X0)
    | ~ aElement0(sK43) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_221]) ).

cnf(c_10114,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X0),xl) != xu
    | ~ aElement0(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10111,c_217]) ).

cnf(c_10142,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(xk,xl) != xu
    | ~ aElement0(sK44) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_219,c_10114]) ).

cnf(c_10143,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10142,c_220,c_214]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : RNG116+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 02:13:35 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.77/1.14  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/1.14  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------  iProver source info
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.77/1.14  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.77/1.14  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.77/1.14  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Parsing...
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  clauses                                 165
% 3.77/1.14  conjectures                             1
% 3.77/1.14  EPR                                     44
% 3.77/1.14  Horn                                    138
% 3.77/1.14  unary                                   47
% 3.77/1.14  binary                                  36
% 3.77/1.14  lits                                    456
% 3.77/1.14  lits eq                                 73
% 3.77/1.14  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.77/1.14  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.77/1.14  fd_cond                                 5
% 3.77/1.14  fd_pseudo_cond                          11
% 3.77/1.14  AC symbols                              0
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ 
% 3.77/1.14  Current options:
% 3.77/1.14  ------ 
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.77/1.14  
% 3.77/1.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------