TSTP Solution File: RNG115+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : RNG115+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:26:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 61 ( 25 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 81 ( 30 ~; 25 |; 25 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 12 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] :
( aElement0(X3)
& sdtasdt0(xa,X3) = X1 )
| aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa)) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( aElement0(X3)
& sdtasdt0(xb,X3) = X2 )
| aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(xb)) )
& xu = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).
fof(m__2273,hypothesis,
( ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa))
& aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(xb))
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = xu )
& aElementOf0(xu,xI)
& xu != sz00
& ! [X1] :
( ( ( ? [X2,X3] :
( aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(xa))
& aElementOf0(X3,slsdtgt0(xb))
& sdtpldt0(X2,X3) = X1 )
| aElementOf0(X1,xI) )
& X1 != sz00 )
=> ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(X1),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__2273) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] :
( aElement0(X3)
& sdtasdt0(xa,X3) = X1 )
| aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa)) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( aElement0(X3)
& sdtasdt0(xb,X3) = X2 )
| aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(xb)) )
& xu = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ aElement0(X7)
| sdtasdt0(xb,X7) != X5
| ~ aElement0(X6)
| sdtasdt0(xa,X6) != X4
| xu != sdtpldt0(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X5,slsdtgt0(xb))
| ~ aElement0(X6)
| sdtasdt0(xa,X6) != X4
| xu != sdtpldt0(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X7)
| sdtasdt0(xb,X7) != X5
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,slsdtgt0(xa))
| xu != sdtpldt0(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X5,slsdtgt0(xb))
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,slsdtgt0(xa))
| xu != sdtpldt0(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( aElementOf0(esk17_0,slsdtgt0(xa))
& aElementOf0(esk18_0,slsdtgt0(xb))
& sdtpldt0(esk17_0,esk18_0) = xu
& aElementOf0(xu,xI)
& xu != sz00
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X7,slsdtgt0(xa))
| ~ aElementOf0(X8,slsdtgt0(xb))
| sdtpldt0(X7,X8) != X6
| X6 = sz00
| ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(X6),sbrdtbr0(xu)) )
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X6,xI)
| X6 = sz00
| ~ iLess0(sbrdtbr0(X6),sbrdtbr0(xu)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__2273])])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( xu != sdtpldt0(X1,X2)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa))
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(xb)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk17_0,esk18_0) = xu,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk18_0,slsdtgt0(xb)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk17_0,slsdtgt0(xa)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : RNG115+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 04:49:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 47
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 165
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 161
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 166
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 161
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 37
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 795
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 692
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 747
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 48
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 161
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 121
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 687
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 3199
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1627
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 521
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 21204
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.053 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.056 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 4152 pages
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------