TSTP Solution File: RNG114+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : RNG114+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:25:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.00s 2.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (  10 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_189,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X1),sdtasdt0(xb,X2)) != xu
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_189) ).

cnf(i_0_171,hypothesis,
    ( sdtasdt0(xa,esk33_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_171) ).

cnf(i_0_172,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(esk33_1(X1))
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_172) ).

cnf(i_0_141,hypothesis,
    ( sdtasdt0(xb,esk25_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_141) ).

cnf(i_0_142,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(esk25_1(X1))
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_142) ).

cnf(i_0_177,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(esk37_0,esk38_0) = xu,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_177) ).

cnf(i_0_179,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(esk37_0,slsdtgt0(xa)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_179) ).

cnf(i_0_178,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(esk38_0,slsdtgt0(xb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-t5m18aql/lgb.p',i_0_178) ).

cnf(c_0_198,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xa,X1),sdtasdt0(xb,X2)) != xu
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    i_0_189 ).

cnf(c_0_199,hypothesis,
    ( sdtasdt0(xa,esk33_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa)) ),
    i_0_171 ).

cnf(c_0_200,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(esk33_1(X1))
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa)) ),
    i_0_172 ).

cnf(c_0_201,hypothesis,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,sdtasdt0(xb,X2)) != xu
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa))
    | ~ aElement0(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_198,c_0_199]),c_0_200]) ).

cnf(c_0_202,hypothesis,
    ( sdtasdt0(xb,esk25_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xb)) ),
    i_0_141 ).

cnf(c_0_203,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(esk25_1(X1))
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xb)) ),
    i_0_142 ).

cnf(c_0_204,hypothesis,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != xu
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xa))
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,slsdtgt0(xb)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_201,c_0_202]),c_0_203]) ).

cnf(c_0_205,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(esk37_0,esk38_0) = xu,
    i_0_177 ).

cnf(c_0_206,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(esk37_0,slsdtgt0(xa)),
    i_0_179 ).

cnf(c_0_207,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(esk38_0,slsdtgt0(xb)),
    i_0_178 ).

cnf(c_0_208,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_204,c_0_205]),c_0_206]),c_0_207])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : RNG114+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 30 15:07:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 9.00/2.58  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.00/2.58  # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.00/2.58  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.00/2.58  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.00/2.58  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.00/2.58  #
% 9.00/2.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 9.00/2.58  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.00/2.58  
% 9.00/2.58  # Proof found!
% 9.00/2.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.00/2.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.00/2.58  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.00/2.58  
% 9.00/2.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.00/2.58  # User time                : 0.132 s
% 9.00/2.58  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 9.00/2.58  # Total time               : 0.143 s
% 9.00/2.58  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 9.00/2.58  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------