TSTP Solution File: RNG106+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : RNG106+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.66s 1.37s
% Output : Proof 7.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ aIdeal0(slsdtgt0(xc)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ aSet0(slsdtgt0(xc))
| aElementOf0(sK9(slsdtgt0(xc)),slsdtgt0(xc))
| aIdeal0(slsdtgt0(xc))
| sP3(slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefIdeal)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ aSet0(slsdtgt0(xc))
| aElementOf0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),slsdtgt0(xc))
| aIdeal0(slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefIdeal)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
aElement0(xc),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1905)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ aSet0(slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),sK9(slsdtgt0(xc))),slsdtgt0(xc))
| aIdeal0(slsdtgt0(xc))
| sP3(slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefIdeal)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ aElement0(xc)
| ~ aElementOf0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ aElementOf0(sK9(slsdtgt0(xc)),slsdtgt0(xc))
| aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),sK9(slsdtgt0(xc))),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(sK10(slsdtgt0(xc)),sK8(slsdtgt0(xc))),slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ sP3(slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefIdeal)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ sPE(slsdtgt0(xc),slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ aElement0(xc)
| aSet0(slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefPrIdeal)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
sPE(slsdtgt0(xc),slsdtgt0(xc)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ aElement0(xc)
| ~ aElementOf0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ aElementOf0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),slsdtgt0(xc))
| aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),sK8(slsdtgt0(xc))),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( aElement0(sK10(slsdtgt0(xc)))
| ~ sP3(slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefIdeal)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ aElement0(sK10(slsdtgt0(xc)))
| ~ aElementOf0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),slsdtgt0(xc))
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(sK8(slsdtgt0(xc)),sK8(slsdtgt0(xc))),slsdtgt0(xc))
| aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(sK10(slsdtgt0(xc)),sK8(slsdtgt0(xc))),slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : RNG106+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.30 % DateTime : Mon May 30 11:44:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 7.66/1.37 % symbols: 51
% 7.66/1.37 % clauses: 152
% 7.66/1.37 % start clauses: 9
% 7.66/1.37 % iterative deepening steps: 565
% 7.66/1.37 % maximum path limit: 2
% 7.66/1.37 % literal attempts: 554198
% 7.66/1.37 % depth failures: 316675
% 7.66/1.37 % regularity failures: 254
% 7.66/1.37 % tautology failures: 689
% 7.66/1.37 % reductions: 223215
% 7.66/1.37 % extensions: 326060
% 7.66/1.37 % SAT variables: 326655
% 7.66/1.37 % SAT clauses: 276001
% 7.66/1.37 % WalkSAT solutions: 275996
% 7.66/1.37 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 7.66/1.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 7.66/1.37 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------