TSTP Solution File: RNG104+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : RNG104+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 02:23:17 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 41 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 109 ( 27 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 109 ( 41 ~; 42 |; 23 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 0 sgn 21 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(9,axiom,
( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1',m__1933) ).
fof(25,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( aElement0(X1)
& aElement0(X2)
& aElement0(X3) )
=> sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1',mMulAsso) ).
fof(27,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElement0(X1)
& aElement0(X2) )
=> aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1',mSortsB_02) ).
fof(34,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElement0(X1)
& aElement0(X2) )
=> sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1',mMulComm) ).
fof(37,axiom,
aElement0(xc),
file('/tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1',m__1905) ).
fof(42,conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
file('/tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1',m__) ).
fof(43,axiom,
( aElement0(xu)
& sdtasdt0(xc,xu) = xx ),
file('/tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1',m__1956) ).
fof(44,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[42]) ).
fof(45,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[44,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(93,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( aElement0(X2)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X2) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& ? [X3] :
( aElement0(X3)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X3) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
fof(94,plain,
( aElement0(esk6_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk6_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(esk7_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk7_0) = xy
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[93]) ).
cnf(95,plain,
aElement0(xz),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[94]) ).
fof(178,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X3)
| sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
fof(179,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ aElement0(X4)
| ~ aElement0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X6)
| sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X4,X5),X6) = sdtasdt0(X4,sdtasdt0(X5,X6)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[178]) ).
cnf(180,plain,
( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aElement0(X3)
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[179]) ).
fof(186,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
fof(187,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ aElement0(X3)
| ~ aElement0(X4)
| aElement0(sdtasdt0(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[186]) ).
cnf(188,plain,
( aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[187]) ).
fof(220,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
fof(221,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ aElement0(X3)
| ~ aElement0(X4)
| sdtasdt0(X3,X4) = sdtasdt0(X4,X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[220]) ).
cnf(222,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[221]) ).
cnf(229,plain,
aElement0(xc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
cnf(255,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45]) ).
cnf(256,plain,
sdtasdt0(xc,xu) = xx,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[43]) ).
cnf(257,plain,
aElement0(xu),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[43]) ).
cnf(316,plain,
( aElement0(xx)
| ~ aElement0(xu)
| ~ aElement0(xc) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[188,256,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(329,plain,
( aElement0(xx)
| $false
| ~ aElement0(xc) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[316,257,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(330,plain,
( aElement0(xx)
| $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[329,229,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(331,plain,
aElement0(xx),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[330,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(540,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xx,X1) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,X1))
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| ~ aElement0(xu)
| ~ aElement0(xc) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[180,256,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(569,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xx,X1) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,X1))
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| $false
| ~ aElement0(xc) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[540,257,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(570,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xx,X1) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,X1))
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[569,229,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(571,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xx,X1) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,X1))
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[570,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1256,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xx,xz) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx)
| ~ aElement0(xz) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[255,571,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1275,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xx,xz) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1256,95,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1276,plain,
sdtasdt0(xx,xz) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1275,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1404,plain,
( ~ aElement0(xx)
| ~ aElement0(xz) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1276,222,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1406,plain,
( $false
| ~ aElement0(xz) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1404,331,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1407,plain,
( $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1406,95,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1408,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1407,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1409,plain,
$false,
1408,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/RNG/RNG104+2.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpfHr-OW/sel_RNG104+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem RNG104+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/RNG/RNG104+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/RNG/RNG104+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------