TSTP Solution File: RNG104+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : RNG104+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:26:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 20 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 20 ~; 15 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).
fof(mMulAsso,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( aElement0(X1)
& aElement0(X2)
& aElement0(X3) )
=> sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mMulAsso) ).
fof(m__1956,hypothesis,
( aElement0(xu)
& sdtasdt0(xc,xu) = xx ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1956) ).
fof(m__1905,hypothesis,
aElement0(xc),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1905) ).
fof(m__1933,hypothesis,
( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1933) ).
fof(mMulComm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElement0(X1)
& aElement0(X2) )
=> sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mMulComm) ).
fof(mSortsB_02,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElement0(X1)
& aElement0(X2) )
=> aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mSortsB_02) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ aElement0(X4)
| ~ aElement0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X6)
| sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X4,X5),X6) = sdtasdt0(X4,sdtasdt0(X5,X6)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulAsso])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aElement0(X3)
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xc,xu) = xx,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1956]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
aElement0(xu),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1956]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
aElement0(xc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1905]) ).
fof(c_0_14,hypothesis,
( aElement0(esk1_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk1_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(esk2_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk2_0) = xy
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__1933])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ aElement0(X3)
| ~ aElement0(X4)
| sdtasdt0(X3,X4) = sdtasdt0(X4,X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulComm])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
( sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,X1)) = sdtasdt0(xx,X1)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
aElement0(xz),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ aElement0(X3)
| ~ aElement0(X4)
| aElement0(sdtasdt0(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSortsB_02])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xc,esk1_0) = xx,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
aElement0(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xx,xz) != sdtasdt0(xz,xx),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( aElement0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aElement0(X2)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(esk1_0,xc) = xx,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_13]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ aElement0(xx),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_13]),c_0_22])]),c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : RNG104+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 05:27:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.59 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.59
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.59 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object total steps : 28
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.22/1.59 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 14
% 0.22/1.59 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.59 # Parsed axioms : 43
% 0.22/1.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 20
% 0.22/1.59 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.22/1.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.22/1.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 48
% 0.22/1.59 # Processed clauses : 58
% 0.22/1.59 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.22/1.59 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.22/1.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 56
% 0.22/1.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.22/1.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Generated clauses : 188
% 0.22/1.59 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 175
% 0.22/1.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Paramodulations : 185
% 0.22/1.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.22/1.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 56
% 0.22/1.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 0.22/1.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.22/1.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 0.22/1.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 165
% 0.22/1.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 616
% 0.22/1.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 281
% 0.22/1.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 163
% 0.22/1.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.22/1.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6078
% 0.22/1.59
% 0.22/1.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.59 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.59 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/1.59 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.22/1.59 # Maximum resident set size: 3108 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------