TSTP Solution File: RNG104+2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : RNG104+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  105 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  118 (  43   ~;  44   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn;  24   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mMulAsso,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aElement0(X1)
        & aElement0(X2)
        & aElement0(X3) )
     => sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',mMulAsso) ).

fof(mEOfElem,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aElementOf0(X2,X1)
         => aElement0(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',mEOfElem) ).

fof(m__1933,hypothesis,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( aElement0(X1)
        & sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xx )
    & aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
    & ? [X1] :
        ( aElement0(X1)
        & sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy )
    & aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
    & aElement0(xz) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',m__1933) ).

fof(mDefPrIdeal,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aElement0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = slsdtgt0(X1)
        <=> ( aSet0(X2)
            & ! [X3] :
                ( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
              <=> ? [X4] :
                    ( aElement0(X4)
                    & sdtasdt0(X1,X4) = X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',mDefPrIdeal) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',m__) ).

fof(m__1956,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xu)
    & sdtasdt0(xc,xu) = xx ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',m__1956) ).

fof(m__1905,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',m__1905) ).

fof(mMulComm,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aElement0(X1)
        & aElement0(X2) )
     => sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p',mMulComm) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31] :
      ( ~ aElement0(X29)
      | ~ aElement0(X30)
      | ~ aElement0(X31)
      | sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X29,X30),X31) = sdtasdt0(X29,sdtasdt0(X30,X31)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulAsso])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X9)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X10,X9)
      | aElement0(X10) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mEOfElem])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(esk1_0)
    & sdtasdt0(xc,esk1_0) = xx
    & aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
    & aElement0(esk2_0)
    & sdtasdt0(xc,esk2_0) = xy
    & aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
    & aElement0(xz) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__1933])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X19,X20,X21,X23] :
      ( ( aSet0(X16)
        | X16 != slsdtgt0(X15)
        | ~ aElement0(X15) )
      & ( aElement0(esk5_3(X15,X16,X17))
        | ~ aElementOf0(X17,X16)
        | X16 != slsdtgt0(X15)
        | ~ aElement0(X15) )
      & ( sdtasdt0(X15,esk5_3(X15,X16,X17)) = X17
        | ~ aElementOf0(X17,X16)
        | X16 != slsdtgt0(X15)
        | ~ aElement0(X15) )
      & ( ~ aElement0(X20)
        | sdtasdt0(X15,X20) != X19
        | aElementOf0(X19,X16)
        | X16 != slsdtgt0(X15)
        | ~ aElement0(X15) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(esk6_2(X15,X21),X21)
        | ~ aElement0(X23)
        | sdtasdt0(X15,X23) != esk6_2(X15,X21)
        | ~ aSet0(X21)
        | X21 = slsdtgt0(X15)
        | ~ aElement0(X15) )
      & ( aElement0(esk7_2(X15,X21))
        | aElementOf0(esk6_2(X15,X21),X21)
        | ~ aSet0(X21)
        | X21 = slsdtgt0(X15)
        | ~ aElement0(X15) )
      & ( sdtasdt0(X15,esk7_2(X15,X21)) = esk6_2(X15,X21)
        | aElementOf0(esk6_2(X15,X21),X21)
        | ~ aSet0(X21)
        | X21 = slsdtgt0(X15)
        | ~ aElement0(X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefPrIdeal])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xc,xu) = xx,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1956]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xu),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1956]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xc),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1905]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aSet0(X1)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( aSet0(X1)
    | X1 != slsdtgt0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,xz)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( sdtasdt0(xc,sdtasdt0(xu,X1)) = sdtasdt0(xx,X1)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xz),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( ~ aElement0(X27)
      | ~ aElement0(X28)
      | sdtasdt0(X27,X28) = sdtasdt0(X28,X27) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulComm])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xx)
    | ~ aSet0(slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( aSet0(slsdtgt0(X1))
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xz,xx) != sdtasdt0(xx,xz),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aElement0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xx),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : RNG104+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 20:13:06 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ayTzilfHqU/E---3.1_31908.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # new_bool_1 with pid 31993 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 31996 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 50
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 48
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 113
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 106
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 120
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 95
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 105
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 92
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 52
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 33
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 78
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 298
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 50
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 451
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 266
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5025
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1844 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------