TSTP Solution File: RNG102+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : RNG102+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:26:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 1.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 14 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 1 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).
fof(m__1933,hypothesis,
( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1933) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ aElement0(X2)
| sdtasdt0(xc,X2) != xy ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( aElement0(esk1_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk1_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(esk2_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk2_0) = xy
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__1933])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xc,X1) != xy
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xc,esk2_0) = xy,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
aElement0(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09 % Problem : RNG102+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.10 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Mon May 30 16:08:27 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/1.35 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.18/1.35 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.18/1.35 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 0.18/1.35
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof found!
% 0.18/1.35 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/1.35 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.18/1.35 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.18/1.35 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.18/1.35 # Parsed axioms : 41
% 0.18/1.35 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 20
% 0.18/1.35 # Initial clauses : 47
% 0.18/1.35 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.18/1.35 # Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 0.18/1.35 # Processed clauses : 46
% 0.18/1.35 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 0.18/1.35 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.18/1.35 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Generated clauses : 139
% 0.18/1.35 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 134
% 0.18/1.35 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Paramodulations : 136
% 0.18/1.35 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.18/1.35 # Current number of processed clauses : 45
% 0.18/1.35 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.18/1.35 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 0.18/1.35 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 133
% 0.18/1.35 # ...number of literals in the above : 514
% 0.18/1.35 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 288
% 0.18/1.35 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 164
% 0.18/1.35 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/1.35 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5237
% 0.18/1.35
% 0.18/1.35 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/1.35 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.18/1.35 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/1.35 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.18/1.35 # Maximum resident set size: 3064 pages
% 0.18/23.35 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.18/23.36 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.36 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.37 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.37 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.39 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.39 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.39 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.39 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.40 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.40 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.40 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.40 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.18/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------