TSTP Solution File: RNG102+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : RNG102+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 14 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn; 1 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1q5FZj3MVZ/E---3.1_15155.p',m__) ).
fof(m__1933,hypothesis,
( ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1q5FZj3MVZ/E---3.1_15155.p',m__1933) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X9] :
( ~ aElement0(X9)
| sdtasdt0(xc,X9) != xy ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( aElement0(esk1_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk1_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(esk2_0)
& sdtasdt0(xc,esk2_0) = xy
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__1933])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElement0(X1)
| sdtasdt0(xc,X1) != xy ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xc,esk2_0) = xy,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
aElement0(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : RNG102+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:47:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1q5FZj3MVZ/E---3.1_15155.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # new_bool_3 with pid 15274 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 15277 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 41
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 20
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 47
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 58
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 58
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 36
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 122
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 45
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 224
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 116
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3249
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1844 pages
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.21/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------