TSTP Solution File: RNG102+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : RNG102+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:54:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.42s 2.04s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   52
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   57 (   4 unt;  50 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   4   ~;   1   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   88 (  41   >;  47   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   39 (  39 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (;   1   !;   3   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0 > aGcdOfAnd0 > misRelativelyPrime0 > iLess0 > doDivides0 > aElementOf0 > aDivisorOf0 > aSet0 > aNaturalNumber0 > aIdeal0 > aElement0 > sdtpldt1 > sdtpldt0 > sdtasdt0 > sdtasasdt0 > #nlpp > smndt0 > slsdtgt0 > sbrdtbr0 > xz > xy > xx > xu > xc > sz10 > sz00 > #skF_22 > #skF_6 > #skF_17 > #skF_25 > #skF_20 > #skF_4 > #skF_8 > #skF_14 > #skF_15 > #skF_18 > #skF_23 > #skF_5 > #skF_19 > #skF_7 > #skF_9 > #skF_13 > #skF_11 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_24 > #skF_12 > #skF_1 > #skF_16 > #skF_21 > #skF_10

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sbrdtbr0,type,
    sbrdtbr0: $i > $i ).

tff(sdtasdt0,type,
    sdtasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aSet0,type,
    aSet0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sz10,type,
    sz10: $i ).

tff(sdtpldt1,type,
    sdtpldt1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_25',type,
    '#skF_25': $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aElement0,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

tff(sz00,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff(misRelativelyPrime0,type,
    misRelativelyPrime0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xu,type,
    xu: $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aIdeal0,type,
    aIdeal0: $i > $o ).

tff(xc,type,
    xc: $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xy,type,
    xy: $i ).

tff(sdtpldt0,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xx,type,
    xx: $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aNaturalNumber0,type,
    aNaturalNumber0: $i > $o ).

tff(slsdtgt0,type,
    slsdtgt0: $i > $i ).

tff(smndt0,type,
    smndt0: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(doDivides0,type,
    doDivides0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(aGcdOfAnd0,type,
    aGcdOfAnd0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(aElementOf0,type,
    aElementOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xz,type,
    xz: $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aDivisorOf0,type,
    aDivisorOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_24',type,
    '#skF_24': $i ).

tff(sdtasasdt0,type,
    sdtasasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i > $i ).

tff(sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0,type,
    sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_361,hypothesis,
    ( ? [W0] :
        ( aElement0(W0)
        & ( sdtasdt0(xc,W0) = xx ) )
    & aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
    & ? [W0] :
        ( aElement0(W0)
        & ( sdtasdt0(xc,W0) = xy ) )
    & aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
    & aElement0(xz) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1933) ).

tff(f_369,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [W0] :
        ( aElement0(W0)
        & ( sdtasdt0(xc,W0) = xy ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(c_212,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xc,'#skF_24') = xy,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_361]) ).

tff(c_214,plain,
    aElement0('#skF_24'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_361]) ).

tff(c_228,plain,
    ! [W0_223] :
      ( ( sdtasdt0(xc,W0_223) != xy )
      | ~ aElement0(W0_223) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_369]) ).

tff(c_252,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xc,'#skF_24') != xy,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_214,c_228]) ).

tff(c_273,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_212,c_252]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : RNG102+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:17:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.42/2.04  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.42/2.04  
% 4.42/2.04  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.42/2.07  
% 4.42/2.07  Inference rules
% 4.42/2.07  ----------------------
% 4.42/2.07  #Ref     : 0
% 4.42/2.07  #Sup     : 13
% 4.42/2.07  #Fact    : 0
% 4.42/2.07  #Define  : 0
% 4.42/2.07  #Split   : 0
% 4.42/2.07  #Chain   : 0
% 4.42/2.07  #Close   : 0
% 4.42/2.07  
% 4.42/2.07  Ordering : KBO
% 4.42/2.07  
% 4.42/2.07  Simplification rules
% 4.42/2.07  ----------------------
% 4.42/2.07  #Subsume      : 1
% 4.42/2.07  #Demod        : 3
% 4.42/2.07  #Tautology    : 10
% 4.42/2.07  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.42/2.07  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.42/2.07  
% 4.42/2.07  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.42/2.07  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.42/2.07  
% 4.42/2.07  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.42/2.07  ----------------------
% 4.42/2.07  Preprocessing        : 0.72
% 4.42/2.07  Parsing              : 0.35
% 4.42/2.07  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 4.42/2.07  Main loop            : 0.28
% 4.42/2.07  Inferencing          : 0.05
% 4.42/2.07  Reduction            : 0.11
% 4.42/2.07  Demodulation         : 0.08
% 4.42/2.07  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 4.42/2.07  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 4.42/2.07  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.42/2.07  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.42/2.07  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.42/2.07  Total                : 1.04
% 4.42/2.07  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.42/2.07  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.42/2.07  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.42/2.07  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------