TSTP Solution File: RNG102+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : RNG102+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:26:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 70 ( 25 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 95 ( 41 ~; 39 |; 12 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 19 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 2 sgn 11 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).
fof(mDefPrIdeal,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = slsdtgt0(X1)
<=> ( aSet0(X2)
& ! [X3] :
( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( aElement0(X4)
& sdtasdt0(X1,X4) = X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mDefPrIdeal) ).
fof(m__1905,hypothesis,
aElement0(xc),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1905) ).
fof(m__1933,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xx,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1933) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(xc,X1) = xy ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ aElement0(X2)
| sdtasdt0(xc,X2) != xy ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( aSet0(X6)
| X6 != slsdtgt0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X5) )
& ( aElement0(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ aElementOf0(X7,X6)
| X6 != slsdtgt0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X5) )
& ( sdtasdt0(X5,esk3_3(X5,X6,X7)) = X7
| ~ aElementOf0(X7,X6)
| X6 != slsdtgt0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X5) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X9)
| sdtasdt0(X5,X9) != X7
| aElementOf0(X7,X6)
| X6 != slsdtgt0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X5) )
& ( ~ aElementOf0(esk4_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ aElement0(X11)
| sdtasdt0(X5,X11) != esk4_2(X5,X6)
| ~ aSet0(X6)
| X6 = slsdtgt0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X5) )
& ( aElement0(esk5_2(X5,X6))
| aElementOf0(esk4_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ aSet0(X6)
| X6 = slsdtgt0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X5) )
& ( sdtasdt0(X5,esk5_2(X5,X6)) = esk4_2(X5,X6)
| aElementOf0(esk4_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ aSet0(X6)
| X6 = slsdtgt0(X5)
| ~ aElement0(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefPrIdeal])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xc,X1) != xy
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,esk3_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| X2 != slsdtgt0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
aElement0(xc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1905]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != slsdtgt0(xc)
| X2 != xy
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1)
| ~ aElement0(esk3_3(xc,X1,X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( aElement0(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ aElement0(X1)
| X2 != slsdtgt0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != slsdtgt0(xc)
| X2 != xy
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != xy
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,slsdtgt0(xc)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xy,slsdtgt0(xc)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1933]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : RNG102+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 30 12:20:57 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 16
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 41
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 20
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses : 43
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41
% 0.22/1.41 # Processed clauses : 1124
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 49
% 0.22/1.41 # ...subsumed : 730
% 0.22/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 345
% 0.22/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.22/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 19
% 0.22/1.41 # Generated clauses : 11617
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 10735
% 0.22/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 231
% 0.22/1.41 # Paramodulations : 11592
% 0.22/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 25
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 315
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 75
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 228
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9190
% 0.22/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 38609
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 30
% 0.22/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17881
% 0.22/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12888
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 765
% 0.22/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 473
% 0.22/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 51
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 228097
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41 # User time : 0.192 s
% 0.22/1.41 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Total time : 0.203 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 12064 pages
% 0.22/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------