TSTP Solution File: RNG101+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : RNG101+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.68s 2.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   5 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_101,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xc,X1) != xx
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kvxk73fo/lgb.p',i_0_101) ).

cnf(i_0_99,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xc,esk21_0) = xx,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kvxk73fo/lgb.p',i_0_99) ).

cnf(i_0_100,hypothesis,
    aElement0(esk21_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kvxk73fo/lgb.p',i_0_100) ).

cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xc,X1) != xx
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    i_0_101 ).

cnf(c_0_106,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xc,esk21_0) = xx,
    i_0_99 ).

cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xc,X1) != sdtasdt0(xc,esk21_0)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,hypothesis,
    aElement0(esk21_0),
    i_0_100 ).

cnf(c_0_109,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : RNG101+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 30 08:27:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.68/2.46  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.68/2.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.68/2.46  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.68/2.46  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI
% 8.68/2.46  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.68/2.46  #
% 8.68/2.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 8.68/2.46  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.68/2.46  
% 8.68/2.46  # Proof found!
% 8.68/2.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.68/2.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.68/2.46  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.68/2.46  
% 8.68/2.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.68/2.46  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 8.68/2.46  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 8.68/2.46  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 8.68/2.46  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.68/2.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------