TSTP Solution File: RNG095+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : RNG095+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 02:17:39 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 62 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 71 ( 29 ~; 22 |; 19 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn 9 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(14,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aElement0(X1)
=> ( ? [X2,X3] :
( aElementOf0(X2,xI)
& aElementOf0(X3,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X2,X3) = X1 )
& aElementOf0(X1,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpyLRx70/sel_RNG095+2.p_1',m__1205_03) ).
fof(15,axiom,
aElement0(sz10),
file('/tmp/tmpyLRx70/sel_RNG095+2.p_1',mSortsC_01) ).
fof(31,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sz10 ),
file('/tmp/tmpyLRx70/sel_RNG095+2.p_1',m__) ).
fof(32,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sz10 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[31]) ).
fof(81,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ aElement0(X1)
| ( ? [X2,X3] :
( aElementOf0(X2,xI)
& aElementOf0(X3,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X2,X3) = X1 )
& aElementOf0(X1,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
fof(82,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ aElement0(X4)
| ( ? [X5,X6] :
( aElementOf0(X5,xI)
& aElementOf0(X6,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X5,X6) = X4 )
& aElementOf0(X4,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[81]) ).
fof(83,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ aElement0(X4)
| ( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X4),xI)
& aElementOf0(esk4_1(X4),xJ)
& sdtpldt0(esk3_1(X4),esk4_1(X4)) = X4
& aElementOf0(X4,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[82]) ).
fof(84,plain,
! [X4] :
( ( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X4),xI)
| ~ aElement0(X4) )
& ( aElementOf0(esk4_1(X4),xJ)
| ~ aElement0(X4) )
& ( sdtpldt0(esk3_1(X4),esk4_1(X4)) = X4
| ~ aElement0(X4) )
& ( aElementOf0(X4,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| ~ aElement0(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[83]) ).
cnf(86,plain,
( sdtpldt0(esk3_1(X1),esk4_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[84]) ).
cnf(87,plain,
( aElementOf0(esk4_1(X1),xJ)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[84]) ).
cnf(88,plain,
( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X1),xI)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[84]) ).
cnf(89,plain,
aElement0(sz10),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
fof(180,negated_conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != sz10 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
fof(181,negated_conjecture,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X3,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,xJ)
| sdtpldt0(X3,X4) != sz10 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[180]) ).
cnf(182,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != sz10
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[181]) ).
cnf(360,plain,
( X1 != sz10
| ~ aElementOf0(esk4_1(X1),xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(esk3_1(X1),xI)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[182,86,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(736,plain,
( X1 != sz10
| ~ aElementOf0(esk4_1(X1),xJ)
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[360,88]) ).
cnf(737,plain,
( X1 != sz10
| ~ aElement0(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[736,87]) ).
cnf(741,plain,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[737,89,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(749,plain,
$false,
741,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/RNG/RNG095+2.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpyLRx70/sel_RNG095+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem RNG095+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/RNG/RNG095+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/RNG/RNG095+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------