TSTP Solution File: RNG091+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : RNG091+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 4 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(33,axiom,
( ~ aSet0(X)
| ~ aSet0(Y)
| Z != sdtpldt1(X,Y)
| aElementOf0(U,Z)
| ~ aElementOf0(V,X)
| ~ aElementOf0(W,Y)
| sdtpldt0(V,W) != U ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSSum) ).
cnf(45,axiom,
( ~ aIdeal0(X)
| aSet0(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefIdeal) ).
cnf(53,hypothesis,
aIdeal0(xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__870) ).
cnf(54,hypothesis,
aIdeal0(xJ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__870) ).
cnf(64,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__994) ).
cnf(65,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__994) ).
cnf(66,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xk),xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1021) ).
cnf(67,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xl),xJ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1021) ).
cnf(68,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xx,xy) = sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),sdtpldt0(xl,xn)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1061) ).
cnf(69,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xz,xx) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xz,xk),sdtasdt0(xz,xl)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1098) ).
cnf(70,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
| ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
cnf(71,plain,
aSet0(xJ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[45,54]) ).
cnf(72,plain,
aSet0(xI),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[45,53]) ).
cnf(271,plain,
aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,72,71,64,65,68,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(272,plain,
~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(xz,xx),sdtpldt1(xI,xJ)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[70,271]) ).
cnf(273,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,72,71,66,67,69,theory(equality)]),272]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : RNG091+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Mon May 30 20:08:10 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.39 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.14/0.39 *
% 0.14/0.39 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.14/0.39 *
% 0.14/0.39 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.14/0.39 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.14/0.39 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.14/0.39 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.39 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.39 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.14/0.39 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.14/0.39 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.14/0.39 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.14/0.39 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.14/0.39 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.14/0.39 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.14/0.39 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.14/0.39 *
% 0.14/0.39 "."
% 0.14/0.39 *
% 0.14/0.39 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T20:08:10
% 0.14/0.39 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-05-30T20:08:10
% 0.14/0.49
% 0.14/0.49
% 0.14/0.49 #||
% 0.14/0.49 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.49 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.49 ||#
% 0.14/0.49
% 0.14/0.49 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.14/0.49 ; 930 formulas have been input or derived (from 73 formulas).
% 0.14/0.49 ; 273 (29%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.14/0.49 ; 8 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.14/0.49 ; 265 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.14/0.49 ;
% 0.14/0.49 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.007 7% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.002 2% Assert (33 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.018 17% Process new row (721 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.032 31% Resolution (144 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.001 1% Paramodulation (72 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.003 3% Condensing (66 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.003 3% Forward subsumption (66 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (62 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (31 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.011 11% Forward simplification (721 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.002 2% Backward simplification (273 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.001 1% Ordering (151 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.023 22% Other
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.103 Total
% 0.14/0.49 ; 0.105 Real time
% 0.14/0.49 ;
% 0.14/0.49 ; Term-hash-array has 523 terms in all.
% 0.14/0.49 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 61 entries (62 at peak, 62 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.14/0.49 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 280 nodes (299 at peak, 299 added, 19 deleted).
% 0.14/0.49 ; Retrieved 23 possibly forward subsuming rows in 66 calls.
% 0.14/0.49 ; Retrieved 8 possibly backward subsumed rows in 62 calls.
% 0.14/0.49 ; Path-index has 520 entries (520 at peak, 538 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.14/0.49 ; Path-index has 754 nodes (754 at peak, 755 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.14/0.49 ; Trie-index has 520 entries (520 at peak, 538 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.14/0.49 ; Trie-index has 1,424 nodes (1,424 at peak, 1,480 added, 56 deleted).
% 0.14/0.49 ; Retrieved 994 generalization terms in 2,165 calls.
% 0.14/0.49 ; Retrieved 210 instance terms in 210 calls.
% 0.14/0.49 ; Retrieved 28,898 unifiable terms in 2,841 calls.
% 0.14/0.49 ;
% 0.14/0.49 ; The agenda of rows to process has 201 entries:
% 0.14/0.49 ; 36 with value 11 12 with value 17 36 with value 25
% 0.14/0.49 ; 64 with value 14 4 with value 20 12 with value 34
% 0.14/0.49 ; 37 with value 16
% 0.14/0.49 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.14/0.49 ; 1 with value 9
% 0.14/0.49 ; The agenda of rows to give has 192 entries:
% 0.14/0.49 ; 4 with value (4 5) 25 with value (4 13) 2 with value (4 25)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 3 with value (4 6) 10 with value (4 14) 2 with value (4 30)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 4 with value (4 7) 11 with value (4 15) 1 with value (4 34)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 41 with value (4 8) 4 with value (4 16) 2 with value (4 39)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 4 with value (4 9) 1 with value (4 17) 2 with value (4 41)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 12 with value (4 10) 6 with value (4 18) 2 with value (4 49)
% 0.14/0.49 ; 53 with value (4 11) 3 with value (4 20)
% 0.14/0.49 Evaluation took:
% 0.14/0.49 0.105 seconds of real time
% 0.14/0.49 0.094772 seconds of user run time
% 0.14/0.49 0.010344 seconds of system run time
% 0.14/0.49 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.14/0.49 0 page faults and
% 0.14/0.49 6,440,600 bytes consed.
% 0.14/0.49 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.14/0.49 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T20:08:10
% 0.14/0.49 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.14/0.49 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------