TSTP Solution File: RNG088+2 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : RNG088+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:38:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 41.69s 41.89s
% Output : Refutation 41.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : RNG088+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed May 8 21:15:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 41.69/41.89 % Version: 1.5
% 41.69/41.89 % SZS status Theorem
% 41.69/41.89 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 41.69/41.89 fof(m__934,plain,((aElementOf0(xk,xI)&aElementOf0(xl,xJ))&xx=sdtpldt0(xk,xl)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__934)).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c15,plain,aElementOf0(xk,xI),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__934])).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(m__967,plain,((aElementOf0(xm,xI)&aElementOf0(xn,xJ))&xy=sdtpldt0(xm,xn)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__967)).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c12,plain,aElementOf0(xm,xI),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__967])).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(m__870,plain,(((((aSet0(xI)&(![W0]:(aElementOf0(W0,xI)=>((![W1]:(aElementOf0(W1,xI)=>aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(W0,W1),xI)))&(![W1]:(aElement0(W1)=>aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(W1,W0),xI)))))))&aIdeal0(xI))&aSet0(xJ))&(![W0]:(aElementOf0(W0,xJ)=>((![W1]:(aElementOf0(W1,xJ)=>aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(W0,W1),xJ)))&(![W1]:(aElement0(W1)=>aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(W1,W0),xJ)))))))&aIdeal0(xJ)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__870)).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(c29,plain,(((((aSet0(xI)&(![W0]:(~aElementOf0(W0,xI)|((![W1]:(~aElementOf0(W1,xI)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(W0,W1),xI)))&(![W1]:(~aElement0(W1)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(W1,W0),xI)))))))&aIdeal0(xI))&aSet0(xJ))&(![W0]:(~aElementOf0(W0,xJ)|((![W1]:(~aElementOf0(W1,xJ)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(W0,W1),xJ)))&(![W1]:(~aElement0(W1)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(W1,W0),xJ)))))))&aIdeal0(xJ)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__870])).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(c31,plain,(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:(((((aSet0(xI)&(~aElementOf0(X6,xI)|((~aElementOf0(X7,xI)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X6,X7),xI))&(~aElement0(X8)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X8,X6),xI)))))&aIdeal0(xI))&aSet0(xJ))&(~aElementOf0(X9,xJ)|((~aElementOf0(X10,xJ)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X9,X10),xJ))&(~aElement0(X11)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X11,X9),xJ)))))&aIdeal0(xJ)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c30,plain,(((((aSet0(xI)&(![X6]:(~aElementOf0(X6,xI)|((![X7]:(~aElementOf0(X7,xI)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X6,X7),xI)))&(![X8]:(~aElement0(X8)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X8,X6),xI)))))))&aIdeal0(xI))&aSet0(xJ))&(![X9]:(~aElementOf0(X9,xJ)|((![X10]:(~aElementOf0(X10,xJ)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X9,X10),xJ)))&(![X11]:(~aElement0(X11)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X11,X9),xJ)))))))&aIdeal0(xJ)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c29])).])).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(c32,plain,(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:(((((aSet0(xI)&((~aElementOf0(X6,xI)|(~aElementOf0(X7,xI)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X6,X7),xI)))&(~aElementOf0(X6,xI)|(~aElement0(X8)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X8,X6),xI)))))&aIdeal0(xI))&aSet0(xJ))&((~aElementOf0(X9,xJ)|(~aElementOf0(X10,xJ)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X9,X10),xJ)))&(~aElementOf0(X9,xJ)|(~aElement0(X11)|aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X11,X9),xJ)))))&aIdeal0(xJ)))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c31])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c34,plain,~aElementOf0(X119,xI)|~aElementOf0(X120,xI)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X119,X120),xI),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c32])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c247,plain,~aElementOf0(X335,xI)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X335,xm),xI),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c34, c12])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c16104,plain,aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c247, c15])).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(m__,conjecture,(aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)&aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__)).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(c9,negated_conjecture,(~(aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)&aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])).
% 41.69/41.89 fof(c10,negated_conjecture,(~aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)|~aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c9])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,~aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)|~aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c10])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c16,plain,aElementOf0(xl,xJ),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__934])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c13,plain,aElementOf0(xn,xJ),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__967])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c38,plain,~aElementOf0(X124,xJ)|~aElementOf0(X123,xJ)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X124,X123),xJ),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c32])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c267,plain,~aElementOf0(X348,xJ)|aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X348,xn),xJ),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c38, c13])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c20148,plain,aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c267, c16])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c66808,plain,~aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c20148, c11])).
% 41.69/41.89 cnf(c80010,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c66808, c16104])).
% 41.69/41.89 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 41.69/41.89
% 41.69/41.89 % Initial clauses : 90
% 41.69/41.89 % Processed clauses : 1743
% 41.69/41.89 % Factors computed : 35
% 41.69/41.89 % Resolvents computed: 79820
% 41.69/41.89 % Tautologies deleted: 5
% 41.69/41.89 % Forward subsumed : 194
% 41.69/41.89 % Backward subsumed : 14
% 41.69/41.89 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 41.69/41.89 % User time : 41.365 s
% 41.69/41.89 % System time : 0.148 s
% 41.69/41.89 % Total time : 41.513 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------