TSTP Solution File: RNG088+2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : RNG088+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   29 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  110 (  35   ~;  36   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn;  21   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)
    & aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B1IbnmBrRD/E---3.1_24568.p',m__) ).

fof(m__870,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xI)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( aElementOf0(X2,xI)
             => aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xI) )
          & ! [X2] :
              ( aElement0(X2)
             => aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X2,X1),xI) ) ) )
    & aIdeal0(xI)
    & aSet0(xJ)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,xJ)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ( aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
             => aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),xJ) )
          & ! [X2] :
              ( aElement0(X2)
             => aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X2,X1),xJ) ) ) )
    & aIdeal0(xJ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B1IbnmBrRD/E---3.1_24568.p',m__870) ).

fof(m__934,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(xk,xI)
    & aElementOf0(xl,xJ)
    & xx = sdtpldt0(xk,xl) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B1IbnmBrRD/E---3.1_24568.p',m__934) ).

fof(m__967,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(xm,xI)
    & aElementOf0(xn,xJ)
    & xy = sdtpldt0(xm,xn) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B1IbnmBrRD/E---3.1_24568.p',m__967) ).

fof(mDefIdeal,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aIdeal0(X1)
    <=> ( aSet0(X1)
        & ! [X2] :
            ( aElementOf0(X2,X1)
           => ( ! [X3] :
                  ( aElementOf0(X3,X1)
                 => aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X2,X3),X1) )
              & ! [X3] :
                  ( aElement0(X3)
                 => aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X3,X2),X1) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B1IbnmBrRD/E---3.1_24568.p',mDefIdeal) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)
      & aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)
    | ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ! [X68,X69,X70,X71,X72,X73] :
      ( aSet0(xI)
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X69,xI)
        | aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X68,X69),xI)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X68,xI) )
      & ( ~ aElement0(X70)
        | aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X70,X68),xI)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X68,xI) )
      & aIdeal0(xI)
      & aSet0(xJ)
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X72,xJ)
        | aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X71,X72),xJ)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X71,xJ) )
      & ( ~ aElement0(X73)
        | aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X73,X71),xJ)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X71,xJ) )
      & aIdeal0(xJ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__870])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI)
    | ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xl,xn),xJ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X2,X1),xJ)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,xJ)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xl,xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__934]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xn,xJ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__967]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X60,X61,X62,X63,X64] :
      ( ( aSet0(X60)
        | ~ aIdeal0(X60) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X62,X60)
        | aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X61,X62),X60)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X61,X60)
        | ~ aIdeal0(X60) )
      & ( ~ aElement0(X63)
        | aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(X63,X61),X60)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X61,X60)
        | ~ aIdeal0(X60) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk9_1(X64),X64)
        | ~ aSet0(X64)
        | aIdeal0(X64) )
      & ( aElement0(esk11_1(X64))
        | aElementOf0(esk10_1(X64),X64)
        | ~ aSet0(X64)
        | aIdeal0(X64) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(esk11_1(X64),esk9_1(X64)),X64)
        | aElementOf0(esk10_1(X64),X64)
        | ~ aSet0(X64)
        | aIdeal0(X64) )
      & ( aElement0(esk11_1(X64))
        | ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(esk9_1(X64),esk10_1(X64)),X64)
        | ~ aSet0(X64)
        | aIdeal0(X64) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(sdtasdt0(esk11_1(X64),esk9_1(X64)),X64)
        | ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(esk9_1(X64),esk10_1(X64)),X64)
        | ~ aSet0(X64)
        | aIdeal0(X64) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefIdeal])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xk,xm),xI),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(X3,X1),X2)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2)
    | ~ aIdeal0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aIdeal0(xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xk,xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__934]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xm,xI),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__967]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : RNG088+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 19:34:30 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.B1IbnmBrRD/E---3.1_24568.p
% 0.22/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 24694 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 24704 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 78
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 76
% 0.22/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 154
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 154
% 0.22/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 255
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 220
% 0.22/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 249
% 0.22/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.22/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 101
% 0.22/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 77
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.22/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 54
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 218
% 0.22/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 892
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 77
% 0.22/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 965
% 0.22/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 267
% 0.22/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.22/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8780
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.072 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.087 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.22/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------