TSTP Solution File: RNG087+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG087+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.51s 2.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 4 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_75,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != xy
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c7zqag7r/input.p',i_0_75) ).
cnf(i_0_65,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk14_0,esk15_0) = xy,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c7zqag7r/input.p',i_0_65) ).
cnf(i_0_66,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk15_0,xJ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c7zqag7r/input.p',i_0_66) ).
cnf(i_0_67,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk14_0,xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c7zqag7r/input.p',i_0_67) ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != xy
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI) ),
i_0_75 ).
cnf(c_0_81,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk14_0,esk15_0) = xy,
i_0_65 ).
cnf(c_0_82,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk15_0,xJ),
i_0_66 ).
cnf(c_0_83,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk14_0,xI),
i_0_67 ).
cnf(c_0_84,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : RNG087+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 13:37:21 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.51/2.52 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.51/2.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.51/2.52 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.51/2.52 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 8.51/2.52 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 8.51/2.52 #
% 8.51/2.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 8.51/2.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.51/2.52
% 8.51/2.52 # Proof found!
% 8.51/2.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.51/2.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.51/2.52 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.51/2.52
% 8.51/2.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.51/2.52 # User time : 0.031 s
% 8.51/2.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.51/2.52 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 8.51/2.52 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.51/2.52
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------