TSTP Solution File: RNG087+2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : RNG087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 20 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 2 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& xy = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZF97Vj94QB/E---3.1_7164.p',m__) ).
fof(m__901,hypothesis,
( ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZF97Vj94QB/E---3.1_7164.p',m__901) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& xy = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X17,X18] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X17,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X18,xJ)
| xy != sdtpldt0(X17,X18) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk1_0,xI)
& aElementOf0(esk2_0,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(esk1_0,esk2_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElementOf0(esk3_0,xI)
& aElementOf0(esk4_0,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(esk3_0,esk4_0) = xy
& aElementOf0(xy,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__901])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| xy != sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk3_0,esk4_0) = xy,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk4_0,xJ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk3_0,xI),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : RNG087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:33:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZF97Vj94QB/E---3.1_7164.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # new_bool_3 with pid 7242 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with pid 7245 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 28
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 53
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 75
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 75
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 143
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 51
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 293
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 122
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3764
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1856 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------