TSTP Solution File: RNG087+2 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : RNG087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:49:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 35
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 43 ( 4 unt; 33 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 20 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 41 ( 20 >; 21 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 29 ( 29 usr; 13 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 2 !; 8 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
aElement0: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
sz00: $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
sz10: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
smndt0: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
sdtasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
aSet0: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
aElementOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
sdtpldt1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
sdtasasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
aIdeal0: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_33,type,
xI: $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
xJ: $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
xx: $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
xy: $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
xz: $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
xk: $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
xl: $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_41,type,
esk2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_42,type,
esk3_4: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_43,type,
esk4_4: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_44,type,
esk5_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_45,type,
esk6_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_46,type,
esk7_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_47,type,
esk8_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_48,type,
esk9_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_49,type,
esk10_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_50,type,
esk11_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_51,type,
esk12_0: $i ).
tff(decl_52,type,
esk13_0: $i ).
tff(decl_53,type,
esk14_0: $i ).
tff(decl_54,type,
esk15_0: $i ).
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& xy = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__901,hypothesis,
( ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__901) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& xy = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X78,X79] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X78,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X79,xJ)
| xy != sdtpldt0(X78,X79) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk12_0,xI)
& aElementOf0(esk13_0,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(esk12_0,esk13_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElementOf0(esk14_0,xI)
& aElementOf0(esk15_0,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(esk14_0,esk15_0) = xy
& aElementOf0(xy,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__901])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| xy != sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk14_0,esk15_0) = xy,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk15_0,xJ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk14_0,xI),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : RNG087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 02:18:58 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.011000 s
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.015000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------