TSTP Solution File: RNG086+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG086+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.48s 2.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 4 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_72,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j1kfb5ql/input.p',i_0_72) ).
cnf(i_0_69,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk12_0,esk13_0) = xx,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j1kfb5ql/input.p',i_0_69) ).
cnf(i_0_70,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk13_0,xJ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j1kfb5ql/input.p',i_0_70) ).
cnf(i_0_71,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk12_0,xI),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j1kfb5ql/input.p',i_0_71) ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI) ),
i_0_72 ).
cnf(c_0_78,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk12_0,esk13_0) = xx,
i_0_69 ).
cnf(c_0_79,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk13_0,xJ),
i_0_70 ).
cnf(c_0_80,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk12_0,xI),
i_0_71 ).
cnf(c_0_81,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),c_0_79]),c_0_80])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : RNG086+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 30 09:17:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.48/2.27 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.48/2.27 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.48/2.27 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.48/2.27 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 4.48/2.27 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 4.48/2.27 #
% 4.48/2.27 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 4.48/2.27 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.48/2.27
% 4.48/2.27 # Proof found!
% 4.48/2.27 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.48/2.27 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.48/2.27 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.48/2.27
% 4.48/2.27 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.48/2.27 # User time : 0.017 s
% 4.48/2.27 # System time : 0.004 s
% 4.48/2.27 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 4.48/2.27 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 4.48/2.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------