TSTP Solution File: RNG086+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : RNG086+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:37:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 20 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& xx = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__901,hypothesis,
( ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = xy )
& aElementOf0(xy,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElement0(xz) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__901) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xI)
& aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
& xx = sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X17,X18] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X17,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X18,xJ)
| xx != sdtpldt0(X17,X18) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk1_0,xI)
& aElementOf0(esk2_0,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(esk1_0,esk2_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElementOf0(esk3_0,xI)
& aElementOf0(esk4_0,xJ)
& sdtpldt0(esk3_0,esk4_0) = xy
& aElementOf0(xy,sdtpldt1(xI,xJ))
& aElement0(xz) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__901])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xI)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,xJ)
| xx != sdtpldt0(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(esk1_0,esk2_0) = xx,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk2_0,xJ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk1_0,xI),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : RNG086+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sat May 18 12:06:53 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # new_bool_3 with pid 18487 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with pid 18490 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 27
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 48
% 0.17/0.44 # Processed clauses : 69
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 69
% 0.17/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.17/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Generated clauses : 15
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.17/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.17/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.17/0.44 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 38
% 0.17/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 141
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 48
% 0.17/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 189
% 0.17/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4111
% 0.17/0.44 # Search garbage collected termcells : 937
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.17/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------