TSTP Solution File: RNG080+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : RNG080+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:41:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 2.73s 2.91s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : RNG080+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 19:37:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.38 The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.38 Mon May 30 19:37:29 2022
% 0.13/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12936.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 222 during input processing: 0 [copy,222,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.38 222 back subsumes 113.
% 0.13/0.38 222 back subsumes 110.
% 0.13/0.38 222 back subsumes 92.
% 0.13/0.38 222 back subsumes 76.
% 0.13/0.38 222 back subsumes 72.
% 0.13/0.38 222 back subsumes 66.
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.57 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.57 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.57 number of clauses in intial UL: 133
% 0.20/0.57 number of clauses initially in problem: 189
% 0.20/0.57 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.20/0.57 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 64
% 0.20/0.57 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.57 absolute distinct symbol count: 34
% 0.20/0.57 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.20/0.57 distinct function count: 10
% 0.20/0.57 distinct constant count: 18
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91 sdtpldt0(xF,xF)=sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xA,xA),xA).
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 2.73/2.91 19 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 606.7 K.
% 2.73/2.91 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 2.73/2.91 sym_ent ( 304) 148 0 148 0 43.9 K
% 2.73/2.91 term ( 32) 25845 23839 2006 14 63.1 K
% 2.73/2.91 rel ( 40) 19524 17177 2347 4 91.8 K
% 2.73/2.91 term_ptr ( 16) 9540 433 9107 15 142.5 K
% 2.73/2.91 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 fpa_head ( 24) 1159 12 1147 9 27.1 K
% 2.73/2.91 fpa_tree ( 56) 1796 1796 0 27 1.5 K
% 2.73/2.91 context (1288) 4336 4336 0 8 10.1 K
% 2.73/2.91 trail ( 24) 78951 78951 0 4 0.1 K
% 2.73/2.91 imd_tree ( 32) 91 8 83 5 2.8 K
% 2.73/2.91 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 is_tree ( 24) 1082 36 1046 12 24.8 K
% 2.73/2.91 is_pos (2424) 9235 9235 0 12 28.4 K
% 2.73/2.91 fsub_pos ( 16) 1577 1577 0 1 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 literal ( 32) 4398 3431 967 2 30.3 K
% 2.73/2.91 clause ( 88) 1167 807 360 1 31.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 list ( 272) 70 63 7 2 2.4 K
% 2.73/2.91 clash_nd ( 80) 606 606 0 6 0.5 K
% 2.73/2.91 clause_ptr ( 16) 383 87 296 2 4.7 K
% 2.73/2.91 int_ptr ( 16) 2875 1894 981 4 15.4 K
% 2.73/2.91 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91 formula( 40) 666 666 0 392 15.3 K
% 2.73/2.91 formula_ptr( 16) 60 60 0 60 0.9 K
% 2.73/2.91 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 2.73/2.91 mod time 0.00
% 2.73/2.91 post_process time 0.00
% 2.73/2.91 back demod time 0.00
% 2.73/2.91 back subsume 0.00
% 2.73/2.91 factor time 0.00
% 2.73/2.91 FINDER time 0.00
% 2.73/2.91 unindex time 0.00
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 2.73/2.91 false clauses given 4
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 FALSE TRUE
% 2.73/2.91 2 5 9
% 2.73/2.91 3 1 4
% 2.73/2.91 4 2 2
% 2.73/2.91 5 7 5
% 2.73/2.91 6 1 3
% 2.73/2.91 7 2 4
% 2.73/2.91 9 0 2
% 2.73/2.91 11 0 2
% 2.73/2.91 12 0 3
% 2.73/2.91 15 0 2
% 2.73/2.91 18 0 1
% 2.73/2.91 19 0 4
% 2.73/2.91 21 0 1
% 2.73/2.91 25 0 1
% 2.73/2.91 26 0 1
% 2.73/2.91 28 0 1
% 2.73/2.91 tot: 18 45 (71.4% true)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 2.73/2.91 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 2.73/2.91 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 2.73/2.91 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 2.73/2.91 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:2 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 2.73/2.91 41:1 42:0 43:0 44:2 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 2.73/2.91 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 2.73/2.91 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 2.73/2.91 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 2.73/2.91 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 2.73/2.91 91:0 92:1 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:4
% 2.73/2.91 All others: 233.
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------