TSTP Solution File: RNG080+2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : RNG080+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.57s 11.78s
% Output : Refutation 11.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 23 unt; 1 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 19 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 13 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(52,axiom,
( ~ aVector0(X)
| ~ aVector0(Y)
| aDimensionOf0(X) != aDimensionOf0(Y)
| aDimensionOf0(Y) = sz00
| sdtasasdt0(X,Y) = sdtpldt0(sdtasasdt0(sziznziztdt0(X),sziznziztdt0(Y)),sdtasdt0(sdtlbdtrb0(X,aDimensionOf0(X)),sdtlbdtrb0(Y,aDimensionOf0(Y)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSPN) ).
cnf(54,hypothesis,
aVector0(xs),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1678) ).
cnf(55,hypothesis,
aVector0(xt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1678) ).
cnf(57,hypothesis,
aDimensionOf0(xs) = aDimensionOf0(xt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1678_01) ).
cnf(58,hypothesis,
aDimensionOf0(xs) != sz00,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1692) ).
cnf(62,hypothesis,
xp = sziznziztdt0(xs),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1709) ).
cnf(67,hypothesis,
xq = sziznziztdt0(xt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1726) ).
cnf(69,hypothesis,
xA = sdtlbdtrb0(xs,aDimensionOf0(xs)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1746) ).
cnf(71,hypothesis,
xB = sdtlbdtrb0(xt,aDimensionOf0(xt)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1766) ).
cnf(72,plain,
xB = sdtlbdtrb0(xt,aDimensionOf0(xs)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[71,57,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(74,hypothesis,
xC = sdtasasdt0(xp,xp),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1783) ).
cnf(76,hypothesis,
xD = sdtasasdt0(xq,xq),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1800) ).
cnf(78,hypothesis,
xE = sdtasasdt0(xp,xq),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1820) ).
cnf(80,hypothesis,
xF = sdtasdt0(xA,xA),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1837) ).
cnf(82,hypothesis,
xG = sdtasdt0(xB,xB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1854) ).
cnf(84,hypothesis,
xH = sdtasdt0(xA,xB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1873) ).
cnf(95,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xC,xF),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2733) ).
cnf(96,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xt),sdtasasdt0(xs,xt)),sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xs),sdtasasdt0(xt,xt))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
cnf(33830,plain,
sdtasasdt0(xs,xs) = sdtpldt0(xC,xF),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,54,54,58,theory(equality)]),80,69,74,62,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(33831,plain,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xs),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[95,33830,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(34383,plain,
sdtasasdt0(xt,xt) = sdtpldt0(xD,xG),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,55,55,theory(equality)]),82,72,76,67,58,57,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(34930,plain,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xs),sdtasasdt0(xt,xt))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[33831,34383,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(34932,plain,
sdtasasdt0(xs,xt) = sdtpldt0(xE,xH),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,54,55,57]),84,72,69,78,67,62,58,57,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(35478,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[34930,96,34932,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : RNG080+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 30 20:03:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.46 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 "."
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T20:03:57
% 0.18/0.46 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-05-30T20:03:57
% 11.57/11.78
% 11.57/11.78
% 11.57/11.78 #||
% 11.57/11.78 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.57/11.78 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 11.66/11.84 ||#
% 11.66/11.84
% 11.66/11.84 ; Summary of computation:
% 11.66/11.84 ; 80778 formulas have been input or derived (from 94 formulas).
% 11.66/11.84 ; 35478 (44%) were retained. Of these,
% 11.66/11.84 ; 3015 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 11.66/11.84 ; 32463 (92%) are still being kept.
% 11.66/11.84 ;
% 11.66/11.84 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.014 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.002 0% Assert (59 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 4.301 38% Process new row (80,741 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 2.708 24% Resolution (186 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.003 0% Paramodulation (93 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.003 0% Condensing (238 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.003 0% Forward subsumption (238 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.002 0% Backward subsumption (159 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (125 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 3.006 27% Forward simplification (80,741 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.863 8% Backward simplification (35,474 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.160 1% Ordering (35,248 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 11.66/11.84 ; 0.262 2% Other
% 11.66/11.84 ; 11.327 Total
% 11.66/11.84 ; 11.389 Real time
% 11.66/11.85 ;
% 11.66/11.85 ; Term-hash-array has 96,984 terms in all.
% 11.66/11.85 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 153 entries (153 at peak, 159 added, 6 deleted).
% 11.66/11.85 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 616 nodes (616 at peak, 660 added, 44 deleted).
% 11.66/11.85 ; Retrieved 195 possibly forward subsuming rows in 238 calls.
% 11.66/11.85 ; Retrieved 47 possibly backward subsumed rows in 159 calls.
% 11.66/11.85 ; Path-index has 90,304 entries (92,322 at peak, 98,824 added, 8,520 deleted).
% 11.66/11.85 ; Path-index has 2,080 nodes (2,084 at peak, 2,212 added, 132 deleted).
% 11.66/11.85 ; Trie-index has 90,304 entries (92,322 at peak, 98,824 added, 8,520 deleted).
% 11.66/11.85 ; Trie-index has 461,059 nodes (470,254 at peak, 502,395 added, 41,336 deleted).
% 11.66/11.85 ; Retrieved 245,785 generalization terms in 1,001,112 calls.
% 11.66/11.85 ; Retrieved 35,319 instance terms in 35,314 calls.
% 11.66/11.85 ; Retrieved 6,996,101 unifiable terms in 271,475 calls.
% 11.66/11.85 ;
% 11.66/11.85 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 11.66/11.85 ; 1 with value 31 2 with value 44
% 11.66/11.85 ; The agenda of rows to give has 32373 entries:
% 11.66/11.85 ; 17 with value (4 5) 142 with value (4 20) 52 with value (4 35)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 15 with value (4 6) 96 with value (4 21) 111 with value (4 36)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 263 with value (4 7) 186 with value (4 23) 42 with value (4 37)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 71 with value (4 8) 16927 with value (4 24) 216 with value (4 38)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 86 with value (4 9) 13 with value (4 25) 25 with value (4 39)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 186 with value (4 10) 914 with value (4 26) 6 with value (4 40)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 566 with value (4 11) 104 with value (4 27) 38 with value (4 41)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 2 with value (4 12) 83 with value (4 28) 8 with value (4 42)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 1177 with value (4 13) 562 with value (4 29) 30 with value (4 43)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 12 with value (4 14) 124 with value (4 30) 4 with value (4 44)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 3472 with value (4 15) 482 with value (4 31) 50 with value (4 45)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 4 with value (4 16) 193 with value (4 32) 2 with value (4 47)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 2603 with value (4 17) 108 with value (4 33) 2 with value (4 49)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 3252 with value (4 18) 112 with value (4 34) 1 with value (4 51)
% 11.66/11.85 ; 14 with value (4 19)
% 11.66/11.85 Evaluation took:
% 11.66/11.85 11.392 seconds of real time
% 11.66/11.85 10.618097 seconds of user run time
% 11.66/11.85 0.772823 seconds of system run time
% 11.66/11.85 [Run times include 2.472 seconds GC run time.]
% 11.66/11.85 0 calls to %EVAL
% 11.66/11.85 0 page faults and
% 11.66/11.85 921,863,400 bytes consed.
% 11.66/11.85 :PROOF-FOUND
% 11.66/11.85 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T20:04:08
% 11.66/11.85 :PROOF-FOUND
% 11.66/11.85 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------