TSTP Solution File: RNG080+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : RNG080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.84s 12.00s
% Output : Refutation 11.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 23 unt; 1 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 19 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 13 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(52,axiom,
( ~ aVector0(X)
| ~ aVector0(Y)
| aDimensionOf0(X) != aDimensionOf0(Y)
| aDimensionOf0(Y) = sz00
| sdtasasdt0(X,Y) = sdtpldt0(sdtasasdt0(sziznziztdt0(X),sziznziztdt0(Y)),sdtasdt0(sdtlbdtrb0(X,aDimensionOf0(X)),sdtlbdtrb0(Y,aDimensionOf0(Y)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSPN) ).
cnf(54,hypothesis,
aVector0(xs),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1678) ).
cnf(55,hypothesis,
aVector0(xt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1678) ).
cnf(57,hypothesis,
aDimensionOf0(xs) = aDimensionOf0(xt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1678_01) ).
cnf(58,hypothesis,
aDimensionOf0(xs) != sz00,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1692) ).
cnf(60,hypothesis,
xp = sziznziztdt0(xs),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1709) ).
cnf(62,hypothesis,
xq = sziznziztdt0(xt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1726) ).
cnf(64,hypothesis,
xA = sdtlbdtrb0(xs,aDimensionOf0(xs)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1746) ).
cnf(66,hypothesis,
xB = sdtlbdtrb0(xt,aDimensionOf0(xt)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1766) ).
cnf(67,plain,
xB = sdtlbdtrb0(xt,aDimensionOf0(xs)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[66,57,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(69,hypothesis,
xC = sdtasasdt0(xp,xp),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1783) ).
cnf(71,hypothesis,
xD = sdtasasdt0(xq,xq),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1800) ).
cnf(73,hypothesis,
xE = sdtasasdt0(xp,xq),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1820) ).
cnf(75,hypothesis,
xF = sdtasdt0(xA,xA),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1837) ).
cnf(77,hypothesis,
xG = sdtasdt0(xB,xB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1854) ).
cnf(79,hypothesis,
xH = sdtasdt0(xA,xB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1873) ).
cnf(90,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xC,xF),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2733) ).
cnf(91,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xt),sdtasasdt0(xs,xt)),sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xs),sdtasasdt0(xt,xt))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
cnf(33823,plain,
sdtasasdt0(xs,xs) = sdtpldt0(xC,xF),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,54,54,58,theory(equality)]),75,64,69,60,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(33824,plain,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xs),sdtpldt0(xD,xG))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[90,33823,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(34376,plain,
sdtasasdt0(xt,xt) = sdtpldt0(xD,xG),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,55,55,theory(equality)]),77,67,71,62,58,57,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(34923,plain,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xE,xH),sdtpldt0(xE,xH)),sdtasdt0(sdtasasdt0(xs,xs),sdtasasdt0(xt,xt))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[33824,34376,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(34925,plain,
sdtasasdt0(xs,xt) = sdtpldt0(xE,xH),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,54,55,57]),79,67,64,73,62,60,58,57,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(35471,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[34923,91,34925,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12 % Problem : RNG080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 17:59:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T17:59:57
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-05-30T17:59:57
% 11.84/12.00
% 11.84/12.00
% 11.84/12.00 #||
% 11.84/12.00 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.84/12.00 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 11.86/12.06 ||#
% 11.86/12.06
% 11.86/12.06 ; Summary of computation:
% 11.86/12.06 ; 80757 formulas have been input or derived (from 90 formulas).
% 11.86/12.06 ; 35471 (44%) were retained. Of these,
% 11.86/12.06 ; 3013 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 11.86/12.06 ; 32458 (92%) are still being kept.
% 11.86/12.06 ;
% 11.86/12.06 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.013 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.003 0% Assert (59 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 4.303 37% Process new row (80,723 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 2.732 24% Resolution (178 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.004 0% Paramodulation (89 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.001 0% Condensing (229 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.002 0% Forward subsumption (229 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.002 0% Backward subsumption (153 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (121 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 3.189 28% Forward simplification (80,723 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.861 7% Backward simplification (35,468 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.127 1% Ordering (35,232 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 0.289 3% Other
% 11.86/12.06 ; 11.527 Total
% 11.86/12.06 ; 11.590 Real time
% 11.86/12.06 ;
% 11.86/12.06 ; Term-hash-array has 96,969 terms in all.
% 11.86/12.06 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 148 entries (148 at peak, 153 added, 5 deleted).
% 11.86/12.06 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 570 nodes (570 at peak, 609 added, 39 deleted).
% 11.86/12.06 ; Retrieved 191 possibly forward subsuming rows in 229 calls.
% 11.86/12.06 ; Retrieved 47 possibly backward subsumed rows in 153 calls.
% 11.86/12.06 ; Path-index has 90,290 entries (92,308 at peak, 98,809 added, 8,519 deleted).
% 11.86/12.06 ; Path-index has 2,076 nodes (2,080 at peak, 2,208 added, 132 deleted).
% 11.86/12.06 ; Trie-index has 90,290 entries (92,308 at peak, 98,809 added, 8,519 deleted).
% 11.86/12.06 ; Trie-index has 461,028 nodes (470,223 at peak, 502,363 added, 41,335 deleted).
% 11.86/12.06 ; Retrieved 245,768 generalization terms in 1,001,019 calls.
% 11.86/12.06 ; Retrieved 35,319 instance terms in 35,314 calls.
% 11.86/12.06 ; Retrieved 6,999,963 unifiable terms in 271,452 calls.
% 11.86/12.06 ;
% 11.86/12.06 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 11.86/12.06 ; 1 with value 31 2 with value 44
% 11.86/12.06 ; The agenda of rows to give has 32371 entries:
% 11.86/12.06 ; 17 with value (4 5) 142 with value (4 20) 52 with value (4 35)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 15 with value (4 6) 96 with value (4 21) 111 with value (4 36)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 263 with value (4 7) 186 with value (4 23) 41 with value (4 37)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 71 with value (4 8) 16927 with value (4 24) 216 with value (4 38)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 86 with value (4 9) 13 with value (4 25) 25 with value (4 39)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 187 with value (4 10) 914 with value (4 26) 6 with value (4 40)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 566 with value (4 11) 104 with value (4 27) 38 with value (4 41)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 2 with value (4 12) 83 with value (4 28) 8 with value (4 42)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 1177 with value (4 13) 561 with value (4 29) 30 with value (4 43)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 12 with value (4 14) 124 with value (4 30) 4 with value (4 44)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 3472 with value (4 15) 482 with value (4 31) 50 with value (4 45)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 4 with value (4 16) 193 with value (4 32) 2 with value (4 47)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 2602 with value (4 17) 108 with value (4 33) 2 with value (4 49)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 3252 with value (4 18) 112 with value (4 34) 1 with value (4 51)
% 11.86/12.06 ; 14 with value (4 19)
% 11.86/12.06 Evaluation took:
% 11.86/12.06 11.593 seconds of real time
% 11.86/12.06 10.814166 seconds of user run time
% 11.86/12.06 0.776986 seconds of system run time
% 11.86/12.06 [Run times include 2.564 seconds GC run time.]
% 11.86/12.06 0 calls to %EVAL
% 11.86/12.06 0 page faults and
% 11.86/12.06 921,967,176 bytes consed.
% 11.86/12.06 :PROOF-FOUND
% 11.86/12.06 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T18:00:09
% 11.86/12.06 :PROOF-FOUND
% 11.86/12.06 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------