TSTP Solution File: RNG079+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : RNG079+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:41:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 2.92s 3.15s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : RNG079+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Mon May 30 20:52:28 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.35 Mon May 30 20:52:28 2022
% 0.11/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24922.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.11/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.11/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.11/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 227 during input processing: 0 [copy,227,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.11/0.35 227 back subsumes 113.
% 0.11/0.35 227 back subsumes 110.
% 0.11/0.35 227 back subsumes 92.
% 0.11/0.35 227 back subsumes 76.
% 0.11/0.35 227 back subsumes 72.
% 0.11/0.35 227 back subsumes 66.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.63/1.85 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.63/1.85 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.63/1.85 number of clauses in intial UL: 133
% 1.63/1.85 number of clauses initially in problem: 192
% 1.63/1.85 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 69
% 1.63/1.85 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 1.63/1.85 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.63/1.85 absolute distinct symbol count: 34
% 1.63/1.85 distinct predicate count: 6
% 1.63/1.85 distinct function count: 10
% 1.63/1.85 distinct constant count: 18
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.63/1.85
% 1.63/1.85 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.92/3.15 sdtpldt0(xF,xF)=sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xA,xA),xA).
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 2.92/3.15 18 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 574.8 K.
% 2.92/3.15 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 2.92/3.15 sym_ent ( 304) 148 0 148 0 43.9 K
% 2.92/3.15 term ( 32) 25398 23447 1951 14 61.4 K
% 2.92/3.15 rel ( 40) 19276 16983 2293 4 89.7 K
% 2.92/3.15 term_ptr ( 16) 9499 487 9012 15 141.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 fpa_head ( 24) 1210 26 1184 9 28.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 fpa_tree ( 56) 1399 1399 0 25 1.4 K
% 2.92/3.15 context (1288) 4046 4046 0 8 10.1 K
% 2.92/3.15 trail ( 24) 77310 77310 0 4 0.1 K
% 2.92/3.15 imd_tree ( 32) 96 8 88 5 2.9 K
% 2.92/3.15 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 is_tree ( 24) 1080 57 1023 12 24.3 K
% 2.92/3.15 is_pos (2424) 8681 8681 0 12 28.4 K
% 2.92/3.15 fsub_pos ( 16) 1416 1416 0 1 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 literal ( 32) 4138 3232 906 2 28.4 K
% 2.92/3.15 clause ( 88) 1125 778 347 1 29.9 K
% 2.92/3.15 list ( 272) 72 65 7 2 2.4 K
% 2.92/3.15 clash_nd ( 80) 510 510 0 6 0.5 K
% 2.92/3.15 clause_ptr ( 16) 373 90 283 2 4.5 K
% 2.92/3.15 int_ptr ( 16) 2659 1820 839 4 13.2 K
% 2.92/3.15 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 formula( 40) 668 668 0 394 15.4 K
% 2.92/3.15 formula_ptr( 16) 62 62 0 62 1.0 K
% 2.92/3.15 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 2.92/3.15 e 0.00
% 2.92/3.15 back subsume 0.00
% 2.92/3.15 factor time 0.00
% 2.92/3.15 FINDER time 0.00
% 2.92/3.15 unindex time 0.00
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 2.92/3.15 false clauses given 2
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 FALSE TRUE
% 2.92/3.15 2 9 7
% 2.92/3.15 3 1 1
% 2.92/3.15 4 2 1
% 2.92/3.15 5 5 6
% 2.92/3.15 6 3 1
% 2.92/3.15 7 2 2
% 2.92/3.15 12 0 1
% 2.92/3.15 15 0 1
% 2.92/3.15 17 1 0
% 2.92/3.15 19 0 1
% 2.92/3.15 21 0 1
% 2.92/3.15 25 0 2
% 2.92/3.15 28 0 1
% 2.92/3.15 tot: 23 25 (52.1% true)
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 2.92/3.15 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 2.92/3.15 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 2.92/3.15 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 2.92/3.15 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:2 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 2.92/3.15 41:1 42:0 43:0 44:2 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 2.92/3.15 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 2.92/3.15 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 2.92/3.15 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 2.92/3.15 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 2.92/3.15 91:0 92:1 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:4
% 2.92/3.15 All others: 222.
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 2.92/3.15
% 2.92/3.15 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------