TSTP Solution File: RNG076+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG076+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.43s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 22 unt; 0 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 71 ( 0 equ; 44 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_96,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_96) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),sdtpldt0(X3,X4))
| ~ aScalar0(X4)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X4)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_94,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_94) ).
cnf(i_0_95,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_95) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_77,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xD),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_77) ).
cnf(i_0_75,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xC),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_75) ).
cnf(i_0_79,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xE),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_79) ).
cnf(i_0_85,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xH),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_85) ).
cnf(i_0_91,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xS),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_91) ).
cnf(i_0_87,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xR),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_87) ).
cnf(i_0_89,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xP),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82rysujl/lgb.p',i_0_89) ).
cnf(c_0_111,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))),
i_0_96 ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),sdtpldt0(X3,X4))
| ~ aScalar0(X4)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X4)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X3) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_113,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)),
i_0_94 ).
cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]),c_0_113])]) ).
cnf(c_0_115,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
i_0_95 ).
cnf(c_0_116,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_117,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_118,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_112]),c_0_115])]),c_0_116]),c_0_117]),c_0_117]) ).
cnf(c_0_119,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_120,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xD),
i_0_77 ).
cnf(c_0_121,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xC),
i_0_75 ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119]),c_0_120]),c_0_121])]) ).
cnf(c_0_123,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xE),
i_0_79 ).
cnf(c_0_124,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_119]),c_0_123])]) ).
cnf(c_0_125,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xH),
i_0_85 ).
cnf(c_0_126,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_119]),c_0_125])]) ).
cnf(c_0_127,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xS),
i_0_91 ).
cnf(c_0_128,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xR),
i_0_87 ).
cnf(c_0_129,plain,
~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_126,c_0_117]),c_0_127]),c_0_128])]) ).
cnf(c_0_130,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xP),
i_0_89 ).
cnf(c_0_131,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_129,c_0_117]),c_0_130])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : RNG076+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 30 10:37:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.43/2.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.43/2.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.43/2.34 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.43/2.34 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 7.43/2.34 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.43/2.34 #
% 7.43/2.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.43/2.34 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.43/2.34
% 7.43/2.34 # Proof found!
% 7.43/2.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.43/2.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.43/2.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.43/2.34
% 7.43/2.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.43/2.34 # User time : 0.028 s
% 7.43/2.34 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.43/2.34 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 7.43/2.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.43/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------