TSTP Solution File: RNG076+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG076+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.18s 2.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 22 unt; 0 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 71 ( 0 equ; 44 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_92,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_92) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),sdtpldt0(X3,X4))
| ~ aScalar0(X4)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X4)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_90,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_90) ).
cnf(i_0_91,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_91) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_73,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xD),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_73) ).
cnf(i_0_71,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xC),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_71) ).
cnf(i_0_75,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xE),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_75) ).
cnf(i_0_81,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xH),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_81) ).
cnf(i_0_87,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xS),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_87) ).
cnf(i_0_83,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xR),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_83) ).
cnf(i_0_85,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xP),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xlfouv3d/lgb.p',i_0_85) ).
cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))),
i_0_92 ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),sdtpldt0(X3,X4))
| ~ aScalar0(X4)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X3)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X4)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X3) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_109,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)),
i_0_90 ).
cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtasdt0(xH,xH)),sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtasdt0(xH,xH))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]),c_0_109])]) ).
cnf(c_0_111,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
i_0_91 ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_113,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_114,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_108]),c_0_111])]),c_0_112]),c_0_113]),c_0_113]) ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_116,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xD),
i_0_73 ).
cnf(c_0_117,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xC),
i_0_71 ).
cnf(c_0_118,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_115]),c_0_116]),c_0_117])]) ).
cnf(c_0_119,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xE),
i_0_75 ).
cnf(c_0_120,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_115]),c_0_119])]) ).
cnf(c_0_121,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xH),
i_0_81 ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_115]),c_0_121])]) ).
cnf(c_0_123,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xS),
i_0_87 ).
cnf(c_0_124,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xR),
i_0_83 ).
cnf(c_0_125,plain,
~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_113]),c_0_123]),c_0_124])]) ).
cnf(c_0_126,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xP),
i_0_85 ).
cnf(c_0_127,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_125,c_0_113]),c_0_126])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : RNG076+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 15:54:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.18/2.49 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.18/2.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.18/2.49 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.18/2.49 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 8.18/2.49 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.18/2.49 #
% 8.18/2.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 8.18/2.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.18/2.49
% 8.18/2.49 # Proof found!
% 8.18/2.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.18/2.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.18/2.49 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.18/2.49
% 8.18/2.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.18/2.49 # User time : 0.028 s
% 8.18/2.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.18/2.49 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 8.18/2.49 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.18/2.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------