TSTP Solution File: RNG074+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : RNG074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:26:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__2590,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__2590) ).
fof(m__2610,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__2610) ).
fof(m__2679,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xR,xS) = sdtpldt0(xP,xP),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__2679) ).
fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__2590]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2610]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xR,xS) = sdtpldt0(xP,xP),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2679]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : RNG074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 30 11:28:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 65
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 84
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 81
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 267
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 248
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 261
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 79
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 40
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 38
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 246
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 1066
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 941
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 214
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9704
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3436 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------