TSTP Solution File: RNG074+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : RNG074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 0.22s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__2590,hypothesis,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ffculEC6oT/E---3.1_28939.p',m__2590) ).

fof(m__2679,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(xR,xS) = sdtpldt0(xP,xP),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ffculEC6oT/E---3.1_28939.p',m__2679) ).

fof(m__2610,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ffculEC6oT/E---3.1_28939.p',m__2610) ).

fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__2590]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,hypothesis,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(xR,xS) = sdtpldt0(xP,xP),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2679]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2610]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : RNG074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 19:40:16 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.52  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ffculEC6oT/E---3.1_28939.p
% 0.22/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # new_bool_3 with pid 29018 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29027 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.54  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 65
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 88
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 0.22/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 57
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 55
% 0.22/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.22/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.22/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 53
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 36
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.22/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.22/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 119
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 110
% 0.22/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.22/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4362
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.22/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------