TSTP Solution File: RNG073+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : RNG073+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.50s 2.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 68 ( 13 equ; 41 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_35,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_35) ).
cnf(i_0_102,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_102) ).
cnf(i_0_97,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_97) ).
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_43,plain,
( X1 = X2
| sdtasdt0(X1,X1) != sdtasdt0(X2,X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X2)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_43) ).
cnf(i_0_101,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_101) ).
cnf(i_0_100,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_100) ).
cnf(i_0_103,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(xP,xP) != sdtpldt0(xR,xS),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_103) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_89,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xP),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_89) ).
cnf(i_0_91,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xS),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_91) ).
cnf(i_0_87,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xR),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uz2vsn38/input.p',i_0_87) ).
cnf(c_0_116,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2) ),
i_0_35 ).
cnf(c_0_117,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP))),
i_0_102 ).
cnf(c_0_118,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS))),
i_0_97 ).
cnf(c_0_119,hypothesis,
( sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_117]),c_0_118])]) ).
cnf(c_0_120,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_121,plain,
( X1 = X2
| sdtasdt0(X1,X1) != sdtasdt0(X2,X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X2)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X1) ),
i_0_43 ).
cnf(c_0_122,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
i_0_101 ).
cnf(c_0_123,plain,
( sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_119,c_0_120]) ).
cnf(c_0_124,hypothesis,
( X1 = sdtpldt0(xR,xS)
| sdtasdt0(X1,X1) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_121,c_0_122]) ).
cnf(c_0_125,plain,
( sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_123,c_0_120]) ).
cnf(c_0_126,hypothesis,
sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
i_0_100 ).
cnf(c_0_127,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(xP,xP) != sdtpldt0(xR,xS),
i_0_103 ).
cnf(c_0_128,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125]),c_0_126])]),c_0_127]) ).
cnf(c_0_129,plain,
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_130,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xP),
i_0_89 ).
cnf(c_0_131,plain,
~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_128,c_0_129]),c_0_130])]) ).
cnf(c_0_132,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xS),
i_0_91 ).
cnf(c_0_133,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xR),
i_0_87 ).
cnf(c_0_134,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_131,c_0_129]),c_0_132]),c_0_133])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : RNG073+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 30 17:05:16 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.50/2.37 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.50/2.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.50/2.37 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.50/2.37 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 7.50/2.37 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.50/2.37 #
% 7.50/2.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 7.50/2.37
% 7.50/2.37 # Proof found!
% 7.50/2.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.50/2.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.50/2.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.50/2.37
% 7.50/2.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.50/2.37 # User time : 0.129 s
% 7.50/2.37 # System time : 0.010 s
% 7.50/2.37 # Total time : 0.138 s
% 7.50/2.37 # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 7.50/2.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------