TSTP Solution File: RNG070+2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : RNG070+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:14:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.19s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 1.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 82 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 77 ( 33 ~; 33 |; 6 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f393,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f384,f388,f392]) ).
fof(f392,plain,
spl2_13,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f391]) ).
fof(f391,plain,
( $false
| spl2_13 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f390,f197]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
aScalar0(xP),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,axiom,
( aScalar0(xP)
& xP = sdtasdt0(xE,xH) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1911) ).
fof(f390,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(xP)
| spl2_13 ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f389]) ).
fof(f389,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(xP)
| ~ aScalar0(xP)
| spl2_13 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f381,f158]) ).
fof(f158,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X0))
| ~ aScalar0(X0)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ aScalar0(X0)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X0)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X0))
| ~ aScalar0(X0)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).
fof(f70,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ( aScalar0(X0)
& aScalar0(X1) )
=> aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X1,X0] :
( ( aScalar0(X0)
& aScalar0(X1) )
=> aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSumSc) ).
fof(f381,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP))
| spl2_13 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f379]) ).
fof(f379,plain,
( spl2_13
<=> aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_13])]) ).
fof(f388,plain,
spl2_12,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f387]) ).
fof(f387,plain,
( $false
| spl2_12 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f386,f204]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
aScalar0(xR),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).
fof(f52,axiom,
( aScalar0(xR)
& xR = sdtasdt0(xC,xG) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1892) ).
fof(f386,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(xR)
| spl2_12 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f385,f189]) ).
fof(f189,plain,
aScalar0(xS),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,axiom,
( aScalar0(xS)
& xS = sdtasdt0(xF,xD) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1930) ).
fof(f385,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(xS)
| ~ aScalar0(xR)
| spl2_12 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f377,f158]) ).
fof(f377,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| spl2_12 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f375]) ).
fof(f375,plain,
( spl2_12
<=> aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_12])]) ).
fof(f384,plain,
( ~ spl2_12
| ~ spl2_13 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f383,f379,f375]) ).
fof(f383,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f369,f221]) ).
fof(f221,plain,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).
fof(f60,axiom,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2590) ).
fof(f369,plain,
( ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS))
| ~ aScalar0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP))
| sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xP,xP),sdtpldt0(xR,xS)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f194,f190]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(flattening,[],[f62]) ).
fof(f62,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f61,conjecture,
sdtlseqdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,xS),sdtpldt0(xP,xP)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(f194,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X0)
| sdtlseqdt0(X0,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).
fof(f142,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ aScalar0(X0)
| sdtlseqdt0(X0,X1)
| sdtlseqdt0(X1,X0)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f119]) ).
fof(f119,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ~ aScalar0(X1)
| sdtlseqdt0(X1,X0)
| sdtlseqdt0(X0,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f118]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X0)
| sdtlseqdt0(X0,X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X0)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( aScalar0(X0)
& aScalar0(X1) )
=> ( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X0)
| sdtlseqdt0(X0,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mLETot) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : RNG070+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 12:16:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51 % (3147)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)lrs+10_1:1_ins=3:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Termination phase: Equality resolution with deletion
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (3139)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (3131)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 1.19/0.52 % (3131)First to succeed.
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.19/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.19/0.53 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)------------------------------
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.19/0.53
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)Time elapsed: 0.068 s
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)------------------------------
% 1.19/0.53 % (3131)------------------------------
% 1.19/0.53 % (3124)Success in time 0.167 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------