TSTP Solution File: RNG061+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : RNG061+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.73s 2.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (  27 unt;   0 nHn;  45 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   75 (  25 equ;  32 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    ( smndt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) = sdtasdt0(X1,smndt0(X2))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_31) ).

cnf(i_0_97,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(smndt0(xS),xR) = smndt0(xN),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_97) ).

cnf(i_0_87,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xR),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_87) ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(smndt0(X1),smndt0(X2)) = sdtasdt0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_32) ).

cnf(i_0_91,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xS),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_91) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    ( smndt0(smndt0(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_93,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xN),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_93) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    ( aScalar0(smndt0(X1))
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_90,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xF,xD) = xS,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_90) ).

cnf(i_0_77,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xD),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_77) ).

cnf(i_0_81,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xF),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_81) ).

cnf(i_0_96,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(smndt0(xS),smndt0(xS)) = sdtasdt0(xS,xS),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_96) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_100,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xR,xR),smndt0(xN)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xS,xS),smndt0(xN))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS)),sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_100) ).

cnf(i_0_99,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xR,xR),smndt0(xN)),sdtpldt0(smndt0(xN),sdtasdt0(xS,xS))) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS)),sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uavu4tym/input.p',i_0_99) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( smndt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) = sdtasdt0(X1,smndt0(X2))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_118,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(smndt0(xS),xR) = smndt0(xN),
    i_0_97 ).

cnf(c_0_119,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xR),
    i_0_87 ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(smndt0(X1),smndt0(X2)) = sdtasdt0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_121,hypothesis,
    ( sdtasdt0(smndt0(xS),smndt0(xR)) = smndt0(smndt0(xN))
    | ~ aScalar0(smndt0(xS)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_118]),c_0_119])]) ).

cnf(c_0_122,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xS),
    i_0_91 ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    ( smndt0(smndt0(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    ( smndt0(smndt0(xN)) = sdtasdt0(xS,xR)
    | ~ aScalar0(smndt0(xS)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]),c_0_119]),c_0_122])]) ).

cnf(c_0_125,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xN),
    i_0_93 ).

cnf(c_0_126,plain,
    ( aScalar0(smndt0(X1))
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_127,plain,
    ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_128,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xF,xD) = xS,
    i_0_90 ).

cnf(c_0_129,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xD),
    i_0_77 ).

cnf(c_0_130,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xF),
    i_0_81 ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(xS,xR) = xN
    | ~ aScalar0(smndt0(xS)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_123,c_0_124]),c_0_125])]) ).

cnf(c_0_132,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(smndt0(xS),smndt0(xS)) = sdtasdt0(xS,xS),
    i_0_96 ).

cnf(c_0_133,plain,
    ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,smndt0(X2)))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_126,c_0_117]),c_0_127]) ).

cnf(c_0_134,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xF,smndt0(xD)) = smndt0(xS),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_128]),c_0_129]),c_0_130])]) ).

cnf(c_0_135,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xS,xR) = xN,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_131,c_0_126]),c_0_122])]) ).

cnf(c_0_136,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_137,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xS,xS))
    | ~ aScalar0(smndt0(xS)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_132]) ).

cnf(c_0_138,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(smndt0(xS)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_133,c_0_134]),c_0_129]),c_0_130])]) ).

cnf(c_0_139,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xS,smndt0(xR)) = smndt0(xN),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_135]),c_0_119]),c_0_122])]) ).

cnf(c_0_140,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xR,xR),smndt0(xN)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xS,xS),smndt0(xN))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS)),sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS))),
    i_0_100 ).

cnf(c_0_141,hypothesis,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_125]) ).

cnf(c_0_142,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xR,xR),smndt0(xN)),sdtpldt0(smndt0(xN),sdtasdt0(xS,xS))) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS)),sdtpldt0(xR,smndt0(xS))),
    i_0_99 ).

cnf(c_0_143,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xS,xS)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_137,c_0_138])]) ).

cnf(c_0_144,plain,
    aScalar0(smndt0(xN)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_133,c_0_139]),c_0_119]),c_0_122])]) ).

cnf(c_0_145,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_140,c_0_141]),c_0_142]),c_0_143]),c_0_144])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : RNG061+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 30 16:46:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.73/2.49  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.73/2.49  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.73/2.49  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.73/2.49  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 8.73/2.49  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.73/2.49  #
% 8.73/2.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 8.73/2.49  
% 8.73/2.49  # Proof found!
% 8.73/2.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.73/2.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.73/2.50  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.73/2.50  
% 8.73/2.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.73/2.50  # User time                : 0.107 s
% 8.73/2.50  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.73/2.50  # Total time               : 0.113 s
% 8.73/2.50  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.73/2.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------