TSTP Solution File: RNG057+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : RNG057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:24:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 14.72s 3.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   65 (   4 equ;  41 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X3,X4))
    | ~ aScalar0(X4)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X4)
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X3)
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_38) ).

cnf(i_0_92,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)) = xN,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_92) ).

cnf(i_0_91,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xE,xE)) = sdtasdt0(xP,xP),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_91) ).

cnf(i_0_90,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_90) ).

cnf(i_0_93,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xP,xP),xN),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_93) ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_34) ).

cnf(i_0_42,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,sdtasdt0(X1,X1))
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_42) ).

cnf(i_0_75,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xE),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_75) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_73,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xD),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_73) ).

cnf(i_0_71,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xC),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_71) ).

cnf(i_0_81,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xH),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxnpqbxp/input.p',i_0_81) ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X3,X4))
    | ~ aScalar0(X4)
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X3)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1)
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,X4)
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,X3)
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X2) ),
    i_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_107,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)) = xN,
    i_0_92 ).

cnf(c_0_108,hypothesis,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),xN)
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(X2,sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_107]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH),sdtasdt0(xE,xE)) = sdtasdt0(xP,xP),
    i_0_91 ).

cnf(c_0_110,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE),sdtasdt0(xC,xD)),
    i_0_90 ).

cnf(c_0_111,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sdtasdt0(xP,xP),xN),
    i_0_93 ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X1)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_113,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,sdtasdt0(xE,xE))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_109]),c_0_110])]),c_0_111]),c_0_112]) ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(sz0z00,sdtasdt0(X1,X1))
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_115,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xE),
    i_0_75 ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xC,xD))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114]),c_0_115])]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aScalar0(X2)
    | ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_118,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xD),
    i_0_73 ).

cnf(c_0_119,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xC),
    i_0_71 ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xH,xH))
    | ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_117]),c_0_118]),c_0_119])]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,hypothesis,
    aScalar0(xH),
    i_0_81 ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    ~ aScalar0(sdtasdt0(xE,xE)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_117]),c_0_121])]) ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_117]),c_0_115])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10  % Problem  : RNG057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.10  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime : Mon May 30 14:39:59 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 14.72/3.13  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by Enigma+tptp-cade20-model02-h2e15+lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15+coop-mzr02:
% 14.72/3.13  # ENIGMA: LightGBM model '/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/data/Enigma/tptp-cade20-model02-h2e15/lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15/model.lgb' loaded. (hash_base: 32768; conj_feats: 23; version: 991; iters: 150)
% 14.72/3.13  # Preprocessing time       : 0.904 s
% 14.72/3.13  
% 14.72/3.13  # Proof found!
% 14.72/3.13  # SZS status Theorem
% 14.72/3.13  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.72/3.13  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 14.72/3.13  
% 14.72/3.13  # -------------------------------------------------
% 14.72/3.13  # User time                : 0.816 s
% 14.72/3.13  # System time              : 0.109 s
% 14.72/3.13  # Total time               : 0.925 s
% 14.72/3.13  # ...preprocessing         : 0.904 s
% 14.72/3.13  # ...main loop             : 0.021 s
% 14.72/3.13  # Maximum resident set size: 168484 pages
% 14.72/3.13  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------