TSTP Solution File: RNG046+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : RNG046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 28 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 69 ( 26 ~; 22 |; 18 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mMNeg,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aScalar0(X1)
& aScalar0(X2) )
=> ( sdtasdt0(X1,smndt0(X2)) = smndt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
& sdtasdt0(smndt0(X1),X2) = smndt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A46WShLUEK/E---3.1_8318.p',mMNeg) ).
fof(m__,conjecture,
sdtasdt0(smndt0(xx),smndt0(xy)) = sdtasdt0(xx,xy),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A46WShLUEK/E---3.1_8318.p',m__) ).
fof(m__799,hypothesis,
( aScalar0(xx)
& aScalar0(xy) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A46WShLUEK/E---3.1_8318.p',m__799) ).
fof(mScZero,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aScalar0(X1)
=> ( sdtpldt0(X1,sz0z00) = X1
& sdtpldt0(sz0z00,X1) = X1
& sdtasdt0(X1,sz0z00) = sz0z00
& sdtasdt0(sz0z00,X1) = sz0z00
& sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(X1)) = sz0z00
& sdtpldt0(smndt0(X1),X1) = sz0z00
& smndt0(smndt0(X1)) = X1
& smndt0(sz0z00) = sz0z00 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A46WShLUEK/E---3.1_8318.p',mScZero) ).
fof(mNegSc,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aScalar0(X1)
=> aScalar0(smndt0(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A46WShLUEK/E---3.1_8318.p',mNegSc) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( ( sdtasdt0(X27,smndt0(X28)) = smndt0(sdtasdt0(X27,X28))
| ~ aScalar0(X27)
| ~ aScalar0(X28) )
& ( sdtasdt0(smndt0(X27),X28) = smndt0(sdtasdt0(X27,X28))
| ~ aScalar0(X27)
| ~ aScalar0(X28) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMNeg])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(smndt0(xx),smndt0(xy)) != sdtasdt0(xx,xy),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,smndt0(X2)) = smndt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( sdtasdt0(smndt0(X1),X2) = smndt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X1)
| ~ aScalar0(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(smndt0(xx),smndt0(xy)) != sdtasdt0(xx,xy),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( sdtasdt0(smndt0(X1),X2) = sdtasdt0(X1,smndt0(X2))
| ~ aScalar0(X2)
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xx),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__799]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X16] :
( ( sdtpldt0(X16,sz0z00) = X16
| ~ aScalar0(X16) )
& ( sdtpldt0(sz0z00,X16) = X16
| ~ aScalar0(X16) )
& ( sdtasdt0(X16,sz0z00) = sz0z00
| ~ aScalar0(X16) )
& ( sdtasdt0(sz0z00,X16) = sz0z00
| ~ aScalar0(X16) )
& ( sdtpldt0(X16,smndt0(X16)) = sz0z00
| ~ aScalar0(X16) )
& ( sdtpldt0(smndt0(X16),X16) = sz0z00
| ~ aScalar0(X16) )
& ( smndt0(smndt0(X16)) = X16
| ~ aScalar0(X16) )
& ( smndt0(sz0z00) = sz0z00
| ~ aScalar0(X16) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mScZero])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xx,smndt0(smndt0(xy))) != sdtasdt0(xx,xy)
| ~ aScalar0(smndt0(xy)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( smndt0(smndt0(X1)) = X1
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
aScalar0(xy),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__799]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X15] :
( ~ aScalar0(X15)
| aScalar0(smndt0(X15)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mNegSc])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ aScalar0(smndt0(xy)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( aScalar0(smndt0(X1))
| ~ aScalar0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : RNG046+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:36:35 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A46WShLUEK/E---3.1_8318.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8395 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8402 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 34
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 88
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 73
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 191
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 164
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 190
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 140
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 40
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 136
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 586
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 33
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 288
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 184
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4990
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------