TSTP Solution File: RNG045+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : RNG045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:27:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : RNG045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 30 08:21:16 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.18/0.36  #
% 0.18/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.36  # Number of axioms: 31 Number of unprocessed: 31
% 0.18/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.18/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.18/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.36  # 31 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.36  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.36  # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.36  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.36  # 23 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.36  # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.36  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 5 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 5 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.38  # There were 5 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.38  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, hypothesis, (aScalar0(xx))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, hypothesis, (sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)))=sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, hypothesis, (aScalar0(xy))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, hypothesis, (aScalar0(xu))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (aNaturalNumber0(sz00))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, hypothesis, (aScalar0(xv))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (aScalar0(sz0z00))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv)))!=sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (szszuzczcdt0(X1)!=sz00|~aNaturalNumber0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (aNaturalNumber0(szszuzczcdt0(X1))|~aNaturalNumber0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (aScalar0(smndt0(X1))|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (sdtasdt0(X1,sz0z00)=sz0z00|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (sdtasdt0(sz0z00,X1)=sz0z00|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (sdtpldt0(X1,sz0z00)=X1|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (sdtpldt0(sz0z00,X1)=X1|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (smndt0(sz0z00)=sz0z00|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (smndt0(smndt0(X1))=X1|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(X1))=sz0z00|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (iLess0(X1,szszuzczcdt0(X1))|~aNaturalNumber0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=X2|szszuzczcdt0(X1)!=szszuzczcdt0(X2)|~aNaturalNumber0(X2)|~aNaturalNumber0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (aScalar0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (aScalar0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (sdtpldt0(smndt0(X1),X1)=sz0z00|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=sz00|aNaturalNumber0(esk1_1(X1))|~aNaturalNumber0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (szszuzczcdt0(esk1_1(X1))=X1|X1=sz00|~aNaturalNumber0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (sdtpldt0(X1,X2)=sdtpldt0(X2,X1)|~aScalar0(X3)|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (sdtasdt0(X1,X2)=sdtasdt0(X2,X1)|~aScalar0(X3)|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3)=sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3))|~aScalar0(X3)|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3)=sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))|~aScalar0(X3)|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X1,X3))=sdtasdt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3))|~aScalar0(X3)|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X3,X2))=sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X3),X2)|~aScalar0(X2)|~aScalar0(X3)|~aScalar0(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38  # Found 8 steps
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv)))!=sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv)))!=sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (szszuzczcdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))))!=szszuzczcdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (~aNaturalNumber0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_60, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (~aNaturalNumber0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_61, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_123, plain, (szszuzczcdt0(szszuzczcdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv)))))!=szszuzczcdt0(szszuzczcdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_123, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_124, plain, (~aNaturalNumber0(szszuzczcdt0(sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_124, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38  cnf(i_0_125, plain, (~aNaturalNumber0(szszuzczcdt0(sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv)))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_125, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.38  # Returning from population with 1 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.18/0.38  # We now have 1 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.38  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.18/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------