TSTP Solution File: RNG045+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : RNG045+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:54:48 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 12.74s 4.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  11 unt;  14 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  18   ~;  12   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   8   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (;   9   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ iLess0 > aScalar0 > aNaturalNumber0 > sdtpldt0 > sdtasdt0 > #nlpp > szszuzczcdt0 > smndt0 > xy > xx > xv > xu > sz0z00 > sz00 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(sdtasdt0,type,
    sdtasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(szszuzczcdt0,type,
    szszuzczcdt0: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(sz00,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff(xu,type,
    xu: $i ).

tff(xy,type,
    xy: $i ).

tff(sdtpldt0,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xx,type,
    xx: $i ).

tff(aNaturalNumber0,type,
    aNaturalNumber0: $i > $o ).

tff(sz0z00,type,
    sz0z00: $i ).

tff(smndt0,type,
    smndt0: $i > $i ).

tff(aScalar0,type,
    aScalar0: $i > $o ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xv,type,
    xv: $i ).

tff(f_136,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__733) ).

tff(f_135,hypothesis,
    ( aScalar0(xx)
    & aScalar0(xy)
    & aScalar0(xu)
    & aScalar0(xv) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__674) ).

tff(f_128,axiom,
    ! [W0,W1,W2] :
      ( ( aScalar0(W0)
        & aScalar0(W1)
        & aScalar0(W2) )
     => ( ( sdtasdt0(W0,sdtpldt0(W1,W2)) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(W0,W1),sdtasdt0(W0,W2)) )
        & ( sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(W0,W1),W2) = sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(W0,W2),sdtasdt0(W1,W2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDistr) ).

tff(f_138,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) != sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(c_66,plain,
    sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))) = sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_136]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    aScalar0(xy),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    aScalar0(xu),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    aScalar0(xv),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [W0_20,W1_21,W2_22] :
      ( ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(W0_20,W1_21),sdtasdt0(W0_20,W2_22)) = sdtasdt0(W0_20,sdtpldt0(W1_21,W2_22)) )
      | ~ aScalar0(W2_22)
      | ~ aScalar0(W1_21)
      | ~ aScalar0(W0_20) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_128]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    aScalar0(xx),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_1454,plain,
    ! [W0_63,W1_64,W2_65] :
      ( ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(W0_63,W1_64),sdtasdt0(W0_63,W2_65)) = sdtasdt0(W0_63,sdtpldt0(W1_64,W2_65)) )
      | ~ aScalar0(W2_65)
      | ~ aScalar0(W1_64)
      | ~ aScalar0(W0_63) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_128]) ).

tff(c_68,plain,
    sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,xu),sdtasdt0(xx,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_138]) ).

tff(c_1466,plain,
    ( ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) )
    | ~ aScalar0(xv)
    | ~ aScalar0(xu)
    | ~ aScalar0(xx) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1454,c_68]) ).

tff(c_1589,plain,
    sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xy,xu),sdtasdt0(xy,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_64,c_60,c_58,c_1466]) ).

tff(c_1776,plain,
    ( ( sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)) )
    | ~ aScalar0(xv)
    | ~ aScalar0(xu)
    | ~ aScalar0(xy) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_56,c_1589]) ).

tff(c_1778,plain,
    sdtpldt0(sdtasdt0(xx,sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),sdtasdt0(xy,sdtpldt0(xu,xv))) != sdtasdt0(sdtpldt0(xx,xy),sdtpldt0(xu,xv)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62,c_60,c_58,c_1776]) ).

tff(c_23880,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_66,c_1778]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : RNG045+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:51:48 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 12.74/4.85  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.74/4.86  
% 12.74/4.86  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 12.74/4.88  
% 12.74/4.88  Inference rules
% 12.74/4.88  ----------------------
% 12.74/4.88  #Ref     : 2
% 12.74/4.88  #Sup     : 5173
% 12.74/4.88  #Fact    : 0
% 12.74/4.88  #Define  : 0
% 12.74/4.88  #Split   : 10
% 12.74/4.88  #Chain   : 0
% 12.74/4.88  #Close   : 0
% 12.74/4.88  
% 12.74/4.88  Ordering : KBO
% 12.74/4.88  
% 12.74/4.88  Simplification rules
% 12.74/4.88  ----------------------
% 12.74/4.88  #Subsume      : 639
% 12.74/4.88  #Demod        : 9297
% 12.74/4.88  #Tautology    : 2215
% 12.74/4.88  #SimpNegUnit  : 22
% 12.74/4.88  #BackRed      : 23
% 12.74/4.88  
% 12.74/4.88  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 12.74/4.88  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 12.74/4.88  
% 12.74/4.88  Timing (in seconds)
% 12.74/4.88  ----------------------
% 12.74/4.89  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 12.74/4.89  Parsing              : 0.26
% 12.74/4.89  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 12.74/4.89  Main loop            : 3.38
% 12.74/4.89  Inferencing          : 0.79
% 12.74/4.89  Reduction            : 1.76
% 12.74/4.89  Demodulation         : 1.53
% 12.74/4.89  BG Simplification    : 0.07
% 12.74/4.89  Subsumption          : 0.59
% 12.74/4.89  Abstraction          : 0.11
% 12.74/4.89  MUC search           : 0.00
% 12.74/4.89  Cooper               : 0.00
% 12.74/4.89  Total                : 3.90
% 12.74/4.89  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 12.74/4.89  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 12.74/4.89  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 12.74/4.89  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------