TSTP Solution File: RNG040-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : RNG040-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:12:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.78s 2.04s
% Output   : Refutation 1.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ product(A,B,C)
    | ~ product(D,B,E)
    | ~ sum(A,D,F)
    | ~ product(F,B,G)
    | sum(C,E,G) ),
    file('RNG040-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ~ sum(l,n,additive_identity),
    file('RNG040-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    sum(b,c,d),
    file('RNG040-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    product(d,a,additive_identity),
    file('RNG040-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    product(b,a,l),
    file('RNG040-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    product(c,a,n),
    file('RNG040-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(149,plain,
    sum(l,n,additive_identity),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[52,8,51,49,50]),
    [iquote('hyper,52,8,51,49,50')] ).

cnf(150,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[149,13]),
    [iquote('binary,149.1,13.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : RNG040-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:12:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.78/2.03  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.78/2.03  The process was started by sandbox2 on n014.cluster.edu,
% 1.78/2.03  Wed Jul 27 02:12:24 2022
% 1.78/2.03  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 14631.
% 1.78/2.03  
% 1.78/2.03  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.78/2.03  set(auto).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.78/2.03  clear(print_given).
% 1.78/2.03  
% 1.78/2.03  list(usable).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] A=A.
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] sum(additive_identity,X,X).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] sum(X,additive_identity,X).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(X,Y,multiply(X,Y)).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] sum(X,Y,add(X,Y)).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] sum(additive_inverse(X),X,additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] sum(X,additive_inverse(X),additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(Y,Z,V)| -sum(U,Z,W)|sum(X,V,W).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(Y,Z,V)| -sum(X,V,W)|sum(U,Z,W).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -sum(X,Y,Z)|sum(Y,X,Z).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(U,Z,W)|product(X,V,W).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(Y,Z,V)| -product(X,V,W)|product(U,Z,W).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(X,Y,V1)| -product(X,Z,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -product(X,V3,V4)|sum(V1,V2,V4).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(X,Y,V1)| -product(X,Z,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -sum(V1,V2,V4)|product(X,V3,V4).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(Y,X,V1)| -product(Z,X,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -product(V3,X,V4)|sum(V1,V2,V4).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(Y,X,V1)| -product(Z,X,V2)| -sum(Y,Z,V3)| -sum(V1,V2,V4)|product(V3,X,V4).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -sum(X,Y,U)| -sum(X,Y,V)|U=V.
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(X,Y,U)| -product(X,Y,V)|U=V.
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(A,multiplicative_identity,A).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(multiplicative_identity,A,A).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(A,h(A),multiplicative_identity)|A=additive_identity.
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(h(A),A,multiplicative_identity)|A=additive_identity.
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -product(A,B,C)|product(B,A,C).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] sum(b,c,d).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(d,a,additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(b,a,l).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] product(c,a,n).
% 1.78/2.03  0 [] -sum(l,n,additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.03  end_of_list.
% 1.78/2.03  
% 1.78/2.03  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.78/2.03  
% 1.78/2.03  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.78/2.03  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.78/2.03  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.78/2.03  clauses in usable.
% 1.78/2.03  
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.78/2.03     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.78/2.03  
% 1.78/2.03  ------------> process usable:
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 1 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(B,D,E)| -sum(C,D,F)|sum(A,E,F).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 2 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(B,D,E)| -sum(A,E,F)|sum(C,D,F).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -sum(A,B,C)|sum(B,A,C).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 4 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(C,D,F)|product(A,E,F).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 5 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(B,D,E)| -product(A,E,F)|product(C,D,F).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 6 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,E)| -sum(B,D,F)| -product(A,F,G)|sum(C,E,G).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 7 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,E)| -sum(B,D,F)| -sum(C,E,G)|product(A,F,G).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 8 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,E)| -sum(A,D,F)| -product(F,B,G)|sum(C,E,G).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 9 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,E)| -sum(A,D,F)| -sum(C,E,G)|product(F,B,G).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -sum(A,B,C)| -sum(A,B,D)|C=D.
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 11 [] -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,B,D)|C=D.
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 12 [] -product(A,B,C)|product(B,A,C).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 13 [] -sum(l,n,additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.03  
% 1.78/2.03  ------------> process sos:
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 38 [] A=A.
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 39 [] sum(additive_identity,A,A).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 40 [] sum(A,additive_identity,A).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 41 [] product(A,B,multiply(A,B)).
% 1.78/2.03  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 42 [] sum(A,B,add(A,B)).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 43 [] sum(additive_inverse(A),A,additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 44 [] sum(A,additive_inverse(A),additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 45 [] product(A,multiplicative_identity,A).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 46 [] product(multiplicative_identity,A,A).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 47 [] product(A,h(A),multiplicative_identity)|A=additive_identity.
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 48 [] product(h(A),A,multiplicative_identity)|A=additive_identity.
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 49 [] sum(b,c,d).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 50 [] product(d,a,additive_identity).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 51 [] product(b,a,l).
% 1.78/2.04  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 52 [] product(c,a,n).
% 1.78/2.04    Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [copy,38,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.78/2.04  38 back subsumes 33.
% 1.78/2.04  38 back subsumes 32.
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 150 [binary,149.1,13.1] $F.
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.78/2.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.78/2.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.78/2.04  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  ============ end of search ============
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.78/2.04  clauses given                 10
% 1.78/2.04  clauses generated            697
% 1.78/2.04  clauses kept                 144
% 1.78/2.04  clauses forward subsumed     585
% 1.78/2.04  clauses back subsumed          7
% 1.78/2.04  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.78/2.04  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.78/2.04  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.78/2.04  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.78/2.04  
% 1.78/2.04  Process 14631 finished Wed Jul 27 02:12:26 2022
% 1.78/2.04  Otter interrupted
% 1.78/2.04  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------