TSTP Solution File: RNG040-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : RNG040-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.65s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(distributivity3,axiom,
( sum(X3,X5,X7)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ product(X4,X2,X5)
| ~ sum(X1,X4,X6)
| ~ product(X6,X2,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uXTgs8eCSZ/E---3.1_5844.p',distributivity3) ).
cnf(d_plus_a,negated_conjecture,
product(d,a,additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uXTgs8eCSZ/E---3.1_5844.p',d_plus_a) ).
cnf(c_plus_a,negated_conjecture,
product(c,a,n),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uXTgs8eCSZ/E---3.1_5844.p',c_plus_a) ).
cnf(b_plus_a,negated_conjecture,
product(b,a,l),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uXTgs8eCSZ/E---3.1_5844.p',b_plus_a) ).
cnf(b_plus_c,negated_conjecture,
sum(b,c,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uXTgs8eCSZ/E---3.1_5844.p',b_plus_c) ).
cnf(prove_equation,negated_conjecture,
~ sum(l,n,additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uXTgs8eCSZ/E---3.1_5844.p',prove_equation) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( sum(X3,X5,X7)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ product(X4,X2,X5)
| ~ sum(X1,X4,X6)
| ~ product(X6,X2,X7) ),
distributivity3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
product(d,a,additive_identity),
d_plus_a ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( sum(X1,X2,additive_identity)
| ~ product(X3,a,X2)
| ~ product(X4,a,X1)
| ~ sum(X4,X3,d) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
product(c,a,n),
c_plus_a ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( sum(X1,n,additive_identity)
| ~ product(X2,a,X1)
| ~ sum(X2,c,d) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
product(b,a,l),
b_plus_a ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sum(b,c,d),
b_plus_c ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ sum(l,n,additive_identity),
prove_equation ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : RNG040-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:32:54 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uXTgs8eCSZ/E---3.1_5844.p
% 0.65/0.56 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.65/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.65/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 5921 completed with status 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.65/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.65/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.65/0.56 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.65/0.56 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 5926 completed with status 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.65/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.65/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.65/0.56 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.65/0.56 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.65/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.65/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.65/0.56
% 0.65/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.65/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.65/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.65/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 27
% 0.65/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Initial clauses : 27
% 0.65/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.65/0.56 # Processed clauses : 896
% 0.65/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 139
% 0.65/0.56 # ...subsumed : 93
% 0.65/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 664
% 0.65/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.65/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 90
% 0.65/0.56 # Generated clauses : 3385
% 0.65/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2502
% 0.65/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Paramodulations : 3385
% 0.65/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 1574
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.65/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 545
% 0.65/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 124
% 0.65/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.65/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.65/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 419
% 0.65/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1504
% 0.65/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 4258
% 0.65/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 119
% 0.65/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19386
% 0.65/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15716
% 0.65/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 94
% 0.65/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 571
% 0.65/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 233
% 0.65/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 100
% 0.65/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.65/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41650
% 0.65/0.56
% 0.65/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.65/0.56 # User time : 0.056 s
% 0.65/0.56 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.65/0.56 # Total time : 0.064 s
% 0.65/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 0.65/0.56
% 0.65/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.65/0.56 # User time : 0.304 s
% 0.65/0.56 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.65/0.56 # Total time : 0.320 s
% 0.65/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.65/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------