TSTP Solution File: RNG039-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : RNG039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 20:40:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.02s 1.21s
% Output   : Refutation 1.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (   4 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(closure_of_addition,axiom,
    sum(X,Y,add(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',closure_of_addition) ).

cnf(distributivity2,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ product(X,U,V)
    | ~ sum(Y,U,W)
    | ~ sum(Z,V,X1)
    | product(X,W,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',distributivity2) ).

cnf(distributivity4,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ product(U,Y,V)
    | ~ sum(X,U,W)
    | ~ sum(Z,V,X1)
    | product(W,Y,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',distributivity4) ).

cnf(multiplication_is_well_defined,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ product(X,Y,U)
    | Z = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/RNG001-0.ax',multiplication_is_well_defined) ).

cnf(absorbtion1,axiom,
    sum(X,add(X,Y),Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorbtion1) ).

cnf(clause33,axiom,
    add(X,additive_identity) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause33) ).

cnf(clause34,axiom,
    add(X,X) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause34) ).

cnf(clause63,axiom,
    product(a,add(b,a),add(c,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause63) ).

cnf(clause71,axiom,
    product(X,X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause71) ).

cnf(b_times_a,negated_conjecture,
    product(b,a,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_times_a) ).

cnf(prove_c_equals_d,negated_conjecture,
    c != d,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_c_equals_d) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ~ product(b,a,c),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[multiplication_is_well_defined,b_times_a,prove_c_equals_d]) ).

cnf(962,plain,
    product(b,add(b,a),add(c,b)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[distributivity4,clause71,clause63,absorbtion1,closure_of_addition]),clause33,clause34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1140,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[distributivity2,66,clause71,absorbtion1,absorbtion1]),962]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : RNG039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Mon May 30 11:13:27 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.41  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.42  * 
% 0.16/0.42  * 
% 0.16/0.43  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.16/0.43   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.16/0.43   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.16/0.43   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.16/0.43   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  "."
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T11:13:27
% 0.16/0.43  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-05-30T11:13:27
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|sum| |additive_identity| ?X ?X).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible right identity assertion (|sum| ?X |additive_identity| ?X).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized relation function assertion (|product| ?X ?Y (|multiply| ?X ?Y)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized relation function assertion (|sum| ?X ?Y (|add| ?X ?Y)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible left inverse assertion (|sum| (|additive_inverse| ?X) ?X |additive_identity|).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|sum| ?X (|additive_inverse| ?X) |additive_identity|).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|sum| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|sum| ?Z ?U ?W)) (|sum| ?X ?V ?W)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|sum| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|sum| ?X ?V ?W)) (|sum| ?Z ?U ?W)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (|sum| ?Y ?X ?Z)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?Z ?U ?W)) (|product| ?X ?V ?W)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?Y ?U ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?X ?V ?W)) (|product| ?Z ?U ?W)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|sum| ?X ?Y ?U)) (= ?Z ?U)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?U)) (= ?Z ?U)).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|add| ?X |additive_identity|) ?X).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Declaring sum to be commutative.
% 0.16/0.44  ; Declaring add to be commutative.
% 1.02/1.21  ; Declaring add to be associative-commutative.
% 1.02/1.21  
% 1.02/1.21  #||
% 1.02/1.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.02/1.21  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.02/1.21  ||#
% 1.02/1.21  
% 1.02/1.21  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.02/1.21  ;     11946 formulas have been input or derived (from 61 formulas).
% 1.02/1.21  ;      1140 (10%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.02/1.21  ;           56 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.02/1.21  ;         1084 (95%) are still being kept.
% 1.02/1.21  ; 
% 1.02/1.21  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.006   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (60 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.096  12%   Process new row              (8,551 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.453  58%   Resolution                   (120 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.002   0%   Paramodulation               (60 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.000   0%   Embedding                    (7 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.002   0%   Condensing                   (10 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (10 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (9 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.001   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (7 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.137  17%   Forward simplification       (8,409 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.016   2%   Backward simplification      (1,138 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.021   3%   Ordering                     (4,985 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering ac                  (37 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.048   6%   Other
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.784        Total
% 1.02/1.21  ;     0.786        Real time
% 1.02/1.21  ; 
% 1.02/1.21  ; Term-hash-array has 1,792 terms in all.
% 1.02/1.21  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 9 entries (9 at peak, 9 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.02/1.21  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 13 nodes (13 at peak, 13 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.02/1.21  ;  Retrieved 4 possibly forward subsuming rows in 10 calls.
% 1.02/1.21  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 9 calls.
% 1.02/1.21  ; Path-index has 1,735 entries (1,735 at peak, 1,803 added, 68 deleted).
% 1.02/1.21  ; Path-index has 983 nodes (983 at peak, 1,002 added, 19 deleted).
% 1.02/1.21  ; Trie-index has 1,735 entries (1,735 at peak, 1,803 added, 68 deleted).
% 1.02/1.21  ; Trie-index has 3,193 nodes (3,193 at peak, 3,335 added, 142 deleted).
% 1.02/1.21  ; Retrieved 59,236 generalization terms in 24,310 calls.
% 1.02/1.21  ; Retrieved 2,203 instance terms in 1,129 calls.
% 1.02/1.21  ; Retrieved 650,798 unifiable terms in 28,628 calls.
% 1.02/1.21  ; 
% 1.02/1.21  ; The agenda of rows to process has 67 entries:
% 1.02/1.21  ;    19 with value 12              4 with value 15              10 with value 17
% 1.02/1.21  ;    18 with value 13              8 with value 16               8 with value 18
% 1.02/1.21  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1040 entries:
% 1.02/1.21  ;    11 with value (4 6)          73 with value (4 13)          63 with value (4 20)
% 1.02/1.21  ;    11 with value (4 7)         139 with value (4 14)          93 with value (4 21)
% 1.02/1.21  ;    10 with value (4 8)          26 with value (4 15)           1 with value (4 22)
% 1.02/1.21  ;    49 with value (4 9)         133 with value (4 16)           7 with value (4 23)
% 1.02/1.21  ;    25 with value (4 10)         88 with value (4 17)          13 with value (4 25)
% 1.02/1.21  ;    41 with value (4 11)         86 with value (4 18)          28 with value (4 26)
% 1.02/1.21  ;    86 with value (4 12)         57 with value (4 19)
% 1.02/1.21  Evaluation took:
% 1.02/1.21    0.786 seconds of real time
% 1.02/1.21    0.739703 seconds of user run time
% 1.05/1.21    0.046833 seconds of system run time
% 1.05/1.21    [Run times include 0.025 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.05/1.21    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.05/1.21    0 page faults and
% 1.05/1.21    49,037,072 bytes consed.
% 1.05/1.21  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.05/1.21  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-30T11:13:28
% 1.05/1.21  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.05/1.21  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------