TSTP Solution File: RNG026-6 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : RNG026-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:14:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   32 (  32 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (  31 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity_for_addition,axiom,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',associativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(right_additive_inverse,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',right_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(left_additive_identity,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',left_additive_identity) ).

cnf(additive_inverse_additive_inverse,axiom,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',additive_inverse_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(commutativity_for_addition,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',commutativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(prove_teichmuller_identity,negated_conjecture,
    add(add(associator(multiply(a,b),c,d),associator(a,b,multiply(c,d))),additive_inverse(add(add(associator(a,multiply(b,c),d),multiply(a,associator(b,c,d))),multiply(associator(a,b,c),d)))) != additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',prove_teichmuller_identity) ).

cnf(associator,axiom,
    associator(X1,X2,X3) = add(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),additive_inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',associator) ).

cnf(distribute2,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',distribute2) ).

cnf(right_additive_identity,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',right_additive_identity) ).

cnf(distribute1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p',distribute1) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_for_addition ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    right_additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    left_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    add(X1,add(additive_inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
    additive_inverse_additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(X1),add(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_for_addition ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(X1),add(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    add(add(associator(multiply(a,b),c,d),associator(a,b,multiply(c,d))),additive_inverse(add(add(associator(a,multiply(b,c),d),multiply(a,associator(b,c,d))),multiply(associator(a,b,c),d)))) != additive_identity,
    prove_teichmuller_identity ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    associator(X1,X2,X3) = add(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),additive_inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))),
    associator ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X1,X2))) = additive_inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_17]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    add(add(add(multiply(multiply(multiply(a,b),c),d),additive_inverse(multiply(multiply(a,b),multiply(c,d)))),add(multiply(multiply(a,b),multiply(c,d)),additive_inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(c,d)))))),additive_inverse(add(add(add(multiply(multiply(a,multiply(b,c)),d),additive_inverse(multiply(a,multiply(multiply(b,c),d)))),multiply(a,add(multiply(multiply(b,c),d),additive_inverse(multiply(b,multiply(c,d)))))),multiply(add(multiply(multiply(a,b),c),additive_inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,c)))),d)))) != additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    additive_inverse(add(additive_inverse(X1),X2)) = add(X1,additive_inverse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    add(multiply(multiply(a,b),multiply(c,d)),add(additive_inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(c,d)))),add(multiply(multiply(multiply(a,b),c),d),add(additive_inverse(multiply(multiply(a,b),multiply(c,d))),additive_inverse(add(multiply(add(multiply(multiply(a,b),c),additive_inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,c)))),d),add(multiply(a,add(multiply(multiply(b,c),d),additive_inverse(multiply(b,multiply(c,d))))),add(multiply(multiply(a,multiply(b,c)),d),additive_inverse(multiply(a,multiply(multiply(b,c),d))))))))))) != additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(X3,add(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    additive_inverse(add(X1,add(additive_inverse(X2),X3))) = add(additive_inverse(X1),add(X2,additive_inverse(X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_22]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(X1),additive_inverse(X2)) = additive_inverse(add(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    distribute2 ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    right_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distribute1 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X2,X1))) = additive_inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]),c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_10]),c_0_25]),c_0_24]),c_0_26]),c_0_10]),c_0_27]),c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_11]),c_0_28]),c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_26]),c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_16]),c_0_10]),c_0_26]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_29]),c_0_10]),c_0_16]),c_0_11]),c_0_28]),c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_16]),c_0_20]),c_0_30]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : RNG026-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 19:56:52 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PLRTTBxFEs/E---3.1_5546.p
% 0.21/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 5624 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 5635 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 16
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.21/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 78
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 14
% 0.21/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 20
% 0.21/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 44
% 0.21/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.21/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 375
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 160
% 0.21/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 375
% 0.21/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 557
% 0.21/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.21/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 109
% 0.21/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 109
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 59
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 44
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3625
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1596 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------