TSTP Solution File: RNG025-5 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : RNG025-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1425.89s 201.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1425.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  43 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (  42 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity_for_addition,axiom,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',associativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(right_additive_inverse,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',right_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(left_additive_identity,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',left_additive_identity) ).

cnf(additive_inverse_additive_inverse,axiom,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',additive_inverse_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(commutativity_for_addition,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',commutativity_for_addition) ).

cnf(associator,axiom,
    associator(X1,X2,X3) = add(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),additive_inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',associator) ).

cnf(prove_equation,negated_conjecture,
    add(associator(x,y,z),associator(x,z,y)) != additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',prove_equation) ).

cnf(right_alternative,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',right_alternative) ).

cnf(distribute1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',distribute1) ).

cnf(distribute2,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p',distribute2) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_for_addition ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    right_additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    left_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    add(X1,add(additive_inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
    additive_inverse_additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(X1),add(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_for_addition ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(X1),add(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    associator(X1,X2,X3) = add(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),additive_inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))),
    associator ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X1,X2))) = additive_inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_17]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    add(associator(x,y,z),associator(x,z,y)) != additive_identity,
    prove_equation ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    associator(X1,X2,X3) = add(additive_inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3))),multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    additive_inverse(add(additive_inverse(X1),X2)) = add(X1,additive_inverse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,additive_inverse(X1))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X2)),
    right_alternative ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distribute1 ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    distribute2 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(X3,add(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(X2,add(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    add(additive_inverse(multiply(x,multiply(y,z))),add(multiply(multiply(x,y),z),add(additive_inverse(multiply(x,multiply(z,y))),multiply(multiply(x,z),y)))) != additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_21]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    add(additive_inverse(X1),X2) = additive_inverse(add(X1,additive_inverse(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(X2)) = additive_inverse(add(X2,additive_inverse(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X2,X1))) = additive_inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X2)),add(multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X3)),add(multiply(multiply(X1,X3),X2),multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)))) = add(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X2)),add(multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X2)),add(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X3))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_24]),c_0_26]),c_0_24]),c_0_10]),c_0_27]),c_0_26]),c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_25]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X2,add(X1,X3)))) = additive_inverse(add(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    additive_inverse(add(multiply(x,multiply(y,z)),additive_inverse(add(multiply(multiply(x,y),z),additive_inverse(add(multiply(x,multiply(z,y)),additive_inverse(multiply(multiply(x,z),y)))))))) != additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X2,additive_inverse(X3)))) = additive_inverse(add(X2,additive_inverse(add(X1,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_10]),c_0_30]),c_0_10]),c_0_30]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,add(X3,additive_inverse(X1)))) = add(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),add(multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X2)),additive_inverse(add(multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X3)),add(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),multiply(multiply(X1,X3),X2)))))) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    additive_inverse(add(multiply(x,multiply(y,z)),add(multiply(x,multiply(z,y)),additive_inverse(add(multiply(multiply(x,y),z),multiply(multiply(x,z),y)))))) != additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    add(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),multiply(multiply(X1,X3),X2)) = add(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    additive_inverse(additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_32]),c_0_11]),c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem    : RNG025-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 19:50:13 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.iBCUMejVJ5/E---3.1_10938.p
% 1425.89/201.99  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1425.89/201.99  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1425.89/201.99  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # new_bool_1 with pid 11017 completed with status 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 1425.89/201.99  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1425.89/201.99  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1425.89/201.99  # Search class: FUUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 1425.89/201.99  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 117s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 11021 completed with status 7
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 31s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # new_bool_1 with pid 11690 completed with status 7
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 11741 completed with status 7
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_208_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # G-E--_208_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 11748 completed with status 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Result found by G-E--_208_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1425.89/201.99  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1425.89/201.99  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1425.89/201.99  # Search class: FUUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 1425.89/201.99  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 117s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 11021 completed with status 7
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 31s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # new_bool_1 with pid 11690 completed with status 7
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 11741 completed with status 7
% 1425.89/201.99  # Starting G-E--_208_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 1425.89/201.99  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1425.89/201.99  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1425.89/201.99  
% 1425.89/201.99  # Proof found!
% 1425.89/201.99  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1425.89/201.99  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1425.89/201.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 23
% 1425.89/201.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 1425.89/201.99  # Initial clauses                      : 22
% 1425.89/201.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 22
% 1425.89/201.99  # Processed clauses                    : 1835
% 1425.89/201.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 754
% 1425.89/201.99  # ...subsumed                          : 920
% 1425.89/201.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 161
% 1425.89/201.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 24
% 1425.89/201.99  # Generated clauses                    : 27851
% 1425.89/201.99  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24397
% 1425.89/201.99  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Paramodulations                      : 27851
% 1425.89/201.99  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8308645
% 1425.89/201.99  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1425.89/201.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 120
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 86
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 32
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 1425.89/201.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22330
% 1425.89/201.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 22330
% 1425.89/201.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 41
% 1425.89/201.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 176
% 1425.89/201.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3311
% 1425.89/201.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 199
% 1425.89/201.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1425.89/201.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 15712647
% 1425.89/201.99  
% 1425.89/201.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1425.89/201.99  # User time                : 196.036 s
% 1425.89/201.99  # System time              : 3.926 s
% 1425.89/201.99  # Total time               : 199.961 s
% 1425.89/201.99  # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 1425.89/201.99  
% 1425.89/201.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1425.89/201.99  # User time                : 196.036 s
% 1425.89/201.99  # System time              : 3.936 s
% 1425.89/201.99  # Total time               : 199.972 s
% 1425.89/201.99  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 1425.89/201.99  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------