TSTP Solution File: RNG025-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : RNG025-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:15:23 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 101.25s 13.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 101.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 43 ( 40 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 45 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 86 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply_over_add2,axiom,
multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',multiply_over_add2) ).
cnf(right_alternative,axiom,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',right_alternative) ).
cnf(add_inverse,axiom,
add(additive_inverse(X1),X1) = additive_identity,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',add_inverse) ).
cnf(commutativity_for_addition,axiom,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',commutativity_for_addition) ).
cnf(left_alternative,axiom,
multiply(multiply(X1,X1),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',left_alternative) ).
cnf(associativity_for_addition,axiom,
add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',associativity_for_addition) ).
cnf(left_additive_identity,axiom,
add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',left_additive_identity) ).
cnf(inverse_product1,axiom,
multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X2) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',inverse_product1) ).
cnf(inverse_product2,axiom,
multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X2)) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',inverse_product2) ).
cnf(multiply_over_add1,axiom,
multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',multiply_over_add1) ).
cnf(sum_of_inverses,axiom,
additive_inverse(add(X1,X2)) = add(additive_inverse(X1),additive_inverse(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',sum_of_inverses) ).
cnf(right_cancellation_for_addition,axiom,
( X2 = X3
| add(X1,X2) != add(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',right_cancellation_for_addition) ).
cnf(additive_inverse_additive_inverse,axiom,
additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',additive_inverse_additive_inverse) ).
cnf(prove_middle_law,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(cy,cx),cy) != multiply(cy,multiply(cx,cy)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p',prove_middle_law) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
multiply(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
multiply_over_add2 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X2)),
right_alternative ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
add(additive_inverse(X1),X1) = additive_identity,
add_inverse ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
commutativity_for_addition ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,multiply(X2,X2))) = multiply(add(X1,multiply(X3,X2)),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
multiply(multiply(X1,X1),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
left_alternative ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(add(X1,X2),X3),
associativity_for_addition ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
left_additive_identity ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X2) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
inverse_product1 ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X2)) = additive_inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
inverse_product2 ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
multiply_over_add1 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
add(multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X3,multiply(X2,X2))) = multiply(add(multiply(X1,X1),multiply(X3,X2)),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
add(X1,add(additive_inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
additive_inverse(add(X1,X2)) = add(additive_inverse(X1),additive_inverse(X2)),
sum_of_inverses ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
multiply(additive_inverse(X1),X2) = multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
( X2 = X3
| add(X1,X2) != add(X1,X3) ),
right_cancellation_for_addition ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),additive_inverse(X2)) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,additive_inverse(X2))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_15]),c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(add(X1,X2),X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_25]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
add(X1,additive_inverse(add(X1,X2))) = additive_inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,additive_inverse(X2)),X3) = multiply(multiply(X1,X2),additive_inverse(X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X1)) = X1,
additive_inverse_additive_inverse ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( X1 = X2
| add(X3,X1) != add(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
add(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,additive_inverse(X2))),multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)) = multiply(multiply(X1,X2),add(additive_inverse(X2),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),add(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,add(X1,X2))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_29]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
add(additive_inverse(X1),add(X2,X1)) = X2,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(cy,cx),cy) != multiply(cy,multiply(cx,cy)),
prove_middle_law ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X1) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]),c_0_39]),c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : RNG025-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:35:15 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5fj9xiSezm/E---3.1_28481.p
% 101.25/13.40 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 101.25/13.40 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 101.25/13.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # new_bool_1 with pid 28575 completed with status 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 101.25/13.40 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 101.25/13.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 101.25/13.40 # Search class: FHUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 101.25/13.40 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 28581 completed with status 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 101.25/13.40 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 101.25/13.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 101.25/13.40 # Search class: FHUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 101.25/13.40 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 101.25/13.40 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 101.25/13.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 101.25/13.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 101.25/13.40
% 101.25/13.40 # Proof found!
% 101.25/13.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 101.25/13.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 101.25/13.40 # Parsed axioms : 18
% 101.25/13.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Initial clauses : 18
% 101.25/13.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 101.25/13.40 # Processed clauses : 28404
% 101.25/13.40 # ...of these trivial : 467
% 101.25/13.40 # ...subsumed : 25159
% 101.25/13.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 2778
% 101.25/13.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4287
% 101.25/13.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Backward-subsumed : 34
% 101.25/13.40 # Backward-rewritten : 92
% 101.25/13.40 # Generated clauses : 960750
% 101.25/13.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 933769
% 101.25/13.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Paramodulations : 956334
% 101.25/13.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # NegExts : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Equation resolutions : 4416
% 101.25/13.40 # Total rewrite steps : 1785555
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 101.25/13.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 101.25/13.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 101.25/13.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 101.25/13.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 101.25/13.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 2633
% 101.25/13.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 269
% 101.25/13.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 66
% 101.25/13.40 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 2298
% 101.25/13.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 904547
% 101.25/13.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 1702765
% 101.25/13.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 144
% 101.25/13.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1719535
% 101.25/13.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1610577
% 101.25/13.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 24397
% 101.25/13.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2387
% 101.25/13.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5652
% 101.25/13.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 427
% 101.25/13.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 101.25/13.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18472952
% 101.25/13.40
% 101.25/13.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 101.25/13.40 # User time : 12.087 s
% 101.25/13.40 # System time : 0.516 s
% 101.25/13.40 # Total time : 12.604 s
% 101.25/13.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 101.25/13.40
% 101.25/13.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 101.25/13.40 # User time : 12.087 s
% 101.25/13.40 # System time : 0.519 s
% 101.25/13.40 # Total time : 12.607 s
% 101.25/13.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 101.25/13.40 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------