TSTP Solution File: RNG024-6 by Toma---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Toma---0.4
% Problem : RNG024-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : toma --casc %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:58:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : RNG024-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : toma --casc %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 02:10:41 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.48 original problem:
% 0.20/0.48 axioms:
% 0.20/0.48 add(additive_identity(), X) = X
% 0.20/0.48 add(X, additive_identity()) = X
% 0.20/0.48 multiply(additive_identity(), X) = additive_identity()
% 0.20/0.48 multiply(X, additive_identity()) = additive_identity()
% 0.20/0.48 add(additive_inverse(X), X) = additive_identity()
% 0.20/0.48 add(X, additive_inverse(X)) = additive_identity()
% 0.20/0.48 additive_inverse(additive_inverse(X)) = X
% 0.20/0.48 multiply(X, add(Y, Z)) = add(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z))
% 0.20/0.48 multiply(add(X, Y), Z) = add(multiply(X, Z), multiply(Y, Z))
% 0.20/0.48 add(X, Y) = add(Y, X)
% 0.20/0.48 add(X, add(Y, Z)) = add(add(X, Y), Z)
% 0.20/0.48 multiply(multiply(X, Y), Y) = multiply(X, multiply(Y, Y))
% 0.20/0.48 multiply(multiply(X, X), Y) = multiply(X, multiply(X, Y))
% 0.20/0.48 associator(X, Y, Z) = add(multiply(multiply(X, Y), Z), additive_inverse(multiply(X, multiply(Y, Z))))
% 0.20/0.48 commutator(X, Y) = add(multiply(Y, X), additive_inverse(multiply(X, Y)))
% 0.20/0.48 goal:
% 0.20/0.48 associator(x(), y(), y()) != additive_identity()
% 0.20/0.48 To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.20/0.48 it suffices to show that associator(x(), y(), y()) = additive_identity() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.20/0.48 Here is an equational proof:
% 0.20/0.48 5: add(X0, additive_inverse(X0)) = additive_identity().
% 0.20/0.48 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 11: multiply(multiply(X0, X1), X1) = multiply(X0, multiply(X1, X1)).
% 0.20/0.48 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 13: associator(X0, X1, X2) = add(multiply(multiply(X0, X1), X2), additive_inverse(multiply(X0, multiply(X1, X2)))).
% 0.20/0.48 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 15: associator(x(), y(), y()) = additive_identity().
% 0.20/0.48 Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [13,11,5]
% 0.20/0.48 rhs with equations [].
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------